基于数据中台的装备保障数据集成

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.06.15

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2020, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 1317-1323.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.06.15

基于数据中台的装备保障数据集成

李文俊^1,²(), 杨学强^1,*(), 杜家兴³()

1. 陆军装甲兵学院装备保障与再制造系, 北京 100072
2. 装备发展部军事代表局驻上海地区军事代表室, 上海 200437
3. 陆军装甲兵学院信息通信系, 北京 100072

收稿日期:2019-08-22 出版日期:2020-06-01 发布日期:2020-06-01
通讯作者: 杨学强 E-mail:471673318@qq.com;15241317@bjtu.edu.cn;dhtl2004@163.com
作者简介:李文俊(1992-),男,博士研究生,主要研究方向为装备保障信息化。E-mail:471673318@qq.com|杜家兴(1976-),男,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为装备保障信息化。E-mail:dhtl2004@163.com
基金资助:
队科研计划项目资助课题

Equipment support data integration based on ODPS

Wenjun LI^1,²(), Xueqiang YANG^1,*(), Jiaxing DU³()

1. Equipment Support and Remanufacturing Department, Army Academy of Armored Forces, Beijing 100072, China
2. Military Commission Equipment Development Department Representative Office in Shanghai Region, Shanghai 200437, China
3. Information and Communication Department, Army Academy of Armored Forces, Beijing 100072, China

Received:2019-08-22 Online:2020-06-01 Published:2020-06-01
Contact: Xueqiang YANG E-mail:471673318@qq.com;15241317@bjtu.edu.cn;dhtl2004@163.com
Supported by:
队科研计划项目资助课题

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对当前装备保障数据分散和决策支持不足的问题,展开装备保障数据集成研究。首先，构建了基于数据中台(open data processing service, ODPS)的装备保障数据集成架构,从数据同步、ODPS和数据服务应用程序接口(application programming interface, API)三方面对其进行了具体分析;然后,为了统一数据视图,提出了朴素贝叶斯和特征词匹配相结合的装备保障集成数据分类方法,为实现“数据互通”提供了有效方法,也为装备保障信息系统高效集成奠定了基础。

关键词: 装备保障, 数据集成, 数据中台, 分类

Abstract:

Aiming at the problem of dispersion and insufficient decision support in equipment support data, the equipment support data integration is studied. The equipment support data integration infrastructure based on open data processing service (ODPS) is put forward. It is analyzed from the aspects of data synchronization, ODPS and data service application programming interface (API). Then, equipment support integrated data classification methods based on naive Bayes and feature words matching are constructed for the equipment support data communication and information system integration.

Key words: equipment support, data integration, open data processing service (ODPS), classification

中图分类号:

李文俊, 杨学强, 杜家兴. 基于数据中台的装备保障数据集成[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(6): 1317-1323.

Wenjun LI, Xueqiang YANG, Jiaxing DU. Equipment support data integration based on ODPS[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(6): 1317-1323.

图/表 5

参考文献 28

1	李文俊, 杨学强. 装备保障信息系统集成研究现状[J]. 军事运筹与系统工程, 2018, 32 (2): 55- 61.
	LI W J , YANG X Q . A review of equipment support information system integration[J]. Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering, 2018, 32 (2): 55- 61.
2	连云峰, 卢昱, 陈立云, 等. 军械装备保障模拟训练系统数据集成研究[J]. 信息技术, 2011, 5, 8- 11.
	LIAN Y F , LU Y , CHEN L Y , et al. Research on data integration of ordnance equipment training simulation system[J]. Information Technology, 2011, 5, 8- 11.
3	金星, 李江杰, 桑运海. 装备保障数据规划与集成应用研究[J]. 航空科学技术, 2014, 7, 48- 54.
	JIN X , LI J J , SANG Y H . Study on data planning and integration of equipment support system[J]. Aeronautical Science & Technology, 2014, 7, 48- 54.
4	周钢, 郭福亮. 面向服务的军械装备保障业务数据集成架构设计[J]. 计算机与现代化, 2017, 3, 112- 116.
	ZHOU G , GUO F L . Data integration architecture design for service-oriented ordnance equipment support service[J]. Computer and Modernization, 2017, 3, 112- 116.
5	张惠民, 胡海荣, 崔伟宁, 等. 基于SOA数据共享技术在装备保障系统中的应用[J]. 四川兵工学报, 2013, 34 (7): 65- 66.
	ZHANG H M , HU H R , CUI W N , et al. Study and use of data synchronization in the general equipment support information system based on SOA[J]. Journal of Sichuan Ordnance, 2013, 34 (7): 65- 66.
6	LABANI M , MORADI P , AHMADIZAR F , et al. A novel multivariate filter method for feature selection in text classification problems[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2018, 70, 25- 37. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2017.12.014
7	KOWSARI K, BROWN D E, HEIDARYSAFA M, et al. HDLTex: hierarchical deep learning for text classification[C]//Proc.of the International Conference on Machine Learning and Application, 2017: 364-371.
8	PAVLINEK M , PODGORELEC V . Text classification method based on self-training and LDA topic models[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2017, 80, 83- 93. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.020
9	SOPHIE B , STEFAN K . Online multi-label dependency topic models for text classification[J]. Machine Learning, 2018, 107 (5): 859- 886. doi: 10.1007/s10994-017-5689-6
10	朱永利, 李莉, 宋亚奇, 等. ODPS平台下的电力设备监测大数据存储与并行处理方法[J]. 电工技术学报, 2017, 32 (9): 199- 210.
	ZHU Y L , LI L , SONG Y Q , et al. Storage and parallel processing of big data of power equipment condition monitoring on ODPS platform[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2017, 32 (9): 199- 210.
11	PURIPUNPINYO H, SAMADZADEH M H. Design, prototype implementation, and comparison of scalable web-push architectures on amazon web services using the actor model[C]//Proc.of the 25th International Conference on Systems Engineering, 2017: 301-308.
12	CHINTAPALLI S, DAGIT D, EVANS B, et al. Benchmarking streaming computation engines: storm, flink and spark streaming[C]// Proc.of the International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops, 2016: 1789-1792.
13	侯一鸣, 徐泉, 李亚杰, 等. 基于物联网和工业云的选矿设备状态监控系统[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2017, 23 (9): 1972- 1981.
	HOU Y M , XU Q , LI Y J , et al. Monitoring system for mine-ral processing equipment based on IoT and industrial cloud computing[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2017, 23 (9): 1972- 1981.
14	WANG T , CHEN M J , ZHAO H Y , et al. Estimating a sparse reduction for general regression in high dimensions[J]. Statistics and Computing, 2018, 28 (1): 33- 46. doi: 10.1007/s11222-016-9714-6
15	KIM S H , LEE N , EBSTYNE P K . Dimensions of religion and spirituality: a longitudinal topic modeling approach[J]. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 2020, 59 (1): 62- 83. doi: 10.1111/jssr.12639
16	YU Y, SILVEIRA H, SUNDARAM M. A microservice based reference architecture model in the context of enterprise architecture[C]//Proc.of the Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Confe-rence, 2016: 1856-1860.
17	KARAMTI H , TMAR M , VISANI M , et al. Vector space model adaptation and pseudo relevance feedback for content-based image retrieval[J]. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2018, 77 (5): 5475- 5501. doi: 10.1007/s11042-017-4463-x
18	华珍.文本聚类中特征选择方法研究[D].武汉:湖北工业大学, 2016.
	HUA Z. Study on feature selection method of text clustering[D]. Wuhan: Hubei University of Technology, 2016.
19	SANTHANAKUMAR M , CHRISTOPHER C C , JAYAPRIYA K . Multi term based co-term frequency method for term weighting in information retrieval[J]. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 2018, 28 (1): 79- 94. doi: 10.1504/IJBIS.2018.091164
20	WANG Y W , FENG L Z , ZHU J M . Novel artificial bee colony based feature selection method for filtering redundant information[J]. Applied Intelligence, 2018, 48 (4): 868- 885. doi: 10.1007/s10489-017-1010-4
21	CHEN J N , HUANG H K . Feature selection for text classification with naive Bayes[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2015, 36 (3): 5432- 5435.
22	KO Y . How to use negative class information for naive Bayes classification[J]. Information Processing & Management, 2017, 53 (6): 1255- 1268.
23	TAEHO J. K nearest neighbor for text summarization using feature similarity[C]//Proc.of the International Conference on Communication, Control, Computing and Electronics Enginee-ring, 2017.DOI: 10.1109/ICCCCEE.2017.7866705.
24	KUMAR P S . Similar vague concepts selection using their euclidean distance at different granulation[J]. Cognitive Computation, 2018, 10 (2): 228- 241. doi: 10.1007/s12559-017-9527-8
25	SAHELI M , KHAJEPOUR S G . Fuzzy inner product spaces[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2016, 303 (2): 149- 162.
26	LI B, HAN L. Distance weighted cosine similarity measure for text classification[C]//Proc.of the 14th International Confe-rence on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning, 2013: 611-618.
27	YANG X, JIN P, CHEN X Y. The construction of a kind of chat corpus in Chinese word segmentation[C]//Proc.of the International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, 2015: 168-172.
28	SOKOLOVA M . Big text advantages and challenges: classification perspective[J]. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 2018, 5 (1): 1- 10.

	平均精确率	平均召回率	F值
改进前	0.47	0.71	0.56
改进后	0.66	0.90	0.76

[1]	王峻洲, 王华伟, 侯召国. 基于相似体系的民机结构超手册维修案例分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(9): 2978-2985.
[2]	童莹萍, 全英汇, 冯伟, 邢孟道. 基于空谱信息协同与Gram-Schmidt变换的多源遥感图像融合方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(7): 2074-2083.
[3]	樊成, 王布宏, 田继伟. 基于多任务学习图卷积模型的航空网络节点分类[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(7): 2341-2349.
[4]	曲志昱, 孙萌, 戴幻尧. 基于共形阵的角度和极化信息联合估计算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(6): 1798-1804.
[5]	李海, 白锦, 孙研, 任嘉伟. 基于修正小波变换插值-TAN的雷达降水粒子分类[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(5): 1527-1535.
[6]	李园, 史宪铭, 李亚娟, 赵美. 基于Adaboost的作战目标属性判定方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(4): 1256-1262.
[7]	蔺瑞管, 王华伟, 车畅畅, 倪晓梅, 熊明兰. 基于LSTM分类器的航空发动机预测性维护模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(3): 1052-1059.
[8]	赵筱彤, 周建江. 低截获MIMO雷达改进MUSIC算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(2): 490-497.
[9]	吕勤哲, 全英汇, 沙明辉, 董淑仙, 邢孟道. 基于集成深度学习的有源干扰智能分类[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(12): 3595-3602.
[10]	王琮, 沈会良, 夏永祥, 白光晗, 方依宁. 装备保障体系关键节点分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(10): 3134-3142.
[11]	陈善学, 王欣欣. 基于空间预处理联合稀疏表示高光谱图像分类[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(9): 2422-2429.
[12]	赖德迪, 罗智徽, 马应龙. 基于共现分析的分类器链标签序列优化方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(9): 2526-2534.
[13]	丁嘉辉, 汤建龙, 于正洋. 轻量化的增量式集成学习算法设计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(4): 861-867.
[14]	陈唯实, 黄毅峰, 陈小龙, 卢贤锋, 张洁. 基于模型转换频率估计的低空目标分类[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(4): 927-936.
[15]	施伟, 黄红蓝, 冯旸赫, 刘忠. 面向多类别分类问题的子抽样主动学习方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(3): 700-708.

基于数据中台的装备保障数据集成

Equipment support data integration based on ODPS

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价