机动平台大斜视压缩感知SAR成像方法

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.10.07

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为降低合成孔径雷达(synthetic aperture radar, SAR)成像系统的数据量并提高其平台适应性,提出了一种基于频域近似观测算子的机动平台大斜视压缩感知SAR成像方法。在构建近似观测算子的过程中,首先,基于等斜视角曲线构建了一种能够精确描述地面散射点成像参数空变性的斜距模型。然后,引入距离走动校正函数和高阶时域扰动因子实现了距离方位的解耦和空变距离徙动的校正,并通过构建时频域的相位滤波因子校正了方位压缩参数的空变性。最后,采用复近似信息传递(complex approximation message passing, CAMP)算法对稀疏和非稀疏场景进行快速、高精度重建。该方法通过校正成像参数的空变性,提高了近似观测算子的精度,实现了扩展场景的机动平台大斜视压缩感知SAR成像,仿真结果支撑了理论分析并验证了所提方法的有效性。

关键词: 合成孔径雷达成像, 压缩感知, 机动平台, 大斜视

Abstract:

To reduce the data volume of the synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imaging system and improve its platform adaptability, a novel frequency-domain approximated observation based high-squint compressed sensing SAR imaging method mounted on maneuvering platforms is proposed. First, a slant range model based on the equal-squint-angle curve is constructed to accurately describe the spatial variability of imaging parameters for the ground scattering point. Then, the range-azimuth decoupling and the spatial-variant range cell migration correcting are realized by introducing the range walk correction function and the high-order time-domain disturbance factor, and the spatial variability of the azimuth compression parameters is corrected by constructing the phase filtering factors in the time and frequency domains. Finally, the complex approximation message passing (CAMP) algorithm is used to obtain fast and high-precision reconstruction of the sparse and non-sparse scene. This method improves the precision of the approximated observation operator by correcting the spatial variability of the imaging parameter, and achieves the high-squint compressed sensing SAR imaging of the extended scene on maneuvering platform. The simulation results support the theoretical analysis and illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Key words: synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imaging, compressed sensing, maneuvering platform, high-squint

中图分类号:

TN957

马彦恒, 李根, 熊旭颖, 侯建强. 机动平台大斜视压缩感知SAR成像方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(10): 2197-2206.

Yanheng MA, Gen LI, Xuying XIONG, Jianqiang HOU. High-squint compressed sensing SAR imaging mounted on maneuvering platform[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(10): 2197-2206.

图/表 13

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

表2

图5

表3

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 21

1	DONOHO D L . Compressed sensing[J]. IEEE Trans.on Information Theory, 2006, 52 (4): 1289- 306. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2006.871582
2	ZHANG B C , HONG W , WU Y R . Sparse microwave imaging:principles and applications[J]. Science China-Information Sciences, 2012, 55 (8): 1722- 1754. doi: 10.1007/s11432-012-4633-4
3	FANG J , XU Z B , ZHANG B C , et al. Fast compressed sensing SAR imaging based on approximated observation[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2014, 7 (1): 352- 363. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2263309
4	LI G , MA Y H , DONG J . Total variation regularization-based compressed sensing synthetic aperture radar imaging[J]. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 2018, 12 (4): 045017.
5	BI H , ZHANG B C , ZHU X X , et al. Extended chirp scaling-baseband azimuth scaling-based azimuth-range decouple L₁ regularization for TOPS SAR imaging via CAMP[J]. IEEE Trans.on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2017, 55 (7): 3748- 3769. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2679129
6	LI Z Y , LIANG Y , XING M D , et al. An improved range model and omega-K-based imaging algorithm for high-squint SAR with curved trajectory and constant acceleration[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2016, 13 (5): 656- 660. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2016.2533631
7	TANG S Y , ZHANG L R , SO H C . Focusing high-resolution highly-squinted airborne SAR data with maneuvers[J]. Remote Sen-sing, 2018, 10 (6): 862. doi: 10.3390/rs10060862
8	ZHOU S , YANG L , ZHAO L F , et al. Quasi-polar-based FFBP algorithm for miniature UAV SAR imaging without navigational data[J]. IEEE Trans.on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2017, 55 (12): 7053- 7065. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2739133
9	FENG D , AN D X , HUANG X . An extended fast factorized back projection algorithm for missile-born bistatic forward-looking SAR imaging[J]. IEEE Trans.on Aerospace & Electronic Systems, 2018, 54 (6): 2724- 2734. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2018.2828238
10	LIAO Y , ZHOU S , YANG L . Focusing of SAR with curved trajectory based on improved hyperbolic range equation[J]. IEEE Geoscience & Remote Sensing Letters, 2018, 15 (3): 454- 458.
11	江淮, 陈思, 赵惠昌, 等. 一种弹载SAR子孔径成像算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2017, 39 (10): 2526- 2530.
	JIANG H , CHEN S , ZHAO H C , et al. A subaperture imag-ing algorithm for ballistic SAR[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2017, 39 (10): 2526- 2530.
12	ZENG T , LI Y H , DING Z G , et al. Subaperture approach based on azimuth-dependent range cell migration correction and azimuth focusing parameter equalization for maneuvering high-squint-mode SAR[J]. IEEE Trans.on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 2015, 53 (12): 6718- 6734.
13	HOU J Q , MA Y H , LI G . A third-order range separation imaging algorithm for manoeuvring platform SAR[J]. Remote Sensing Letters, 2019, 10 (8): 786- 795. doi: 10.1080/2150704X.2019.1610982
14	LI Z Y , XING M D , LIANG Y , et al. A frequency-domain imag-ing algorithm for highly squinted SAR mounted on maneuvering platforms with nonlinear trajectory[J]. IEEE Trans.on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 2016, 54 (7): 4023- 4038.
15	MALEKI A , ANITORI L , YANG Z , et al. Asymptotic analysis of complex LASSO via complex approximate message pas-sing (CAMP)[J]. IEEE Trans.on Information Theory, 2013, 59 (7): 4290- 4308. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2013.2252232
16	TORGRIMSSON J , DAMMERT P , HELLSTEN H , et al. Factorized geometrical autofocus for synthetic aperture radar processing[J]. IEEE Trans.on Geoscience and Remote Sen-sing, 2014, 52 (10): 6674- 6687. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2300347
17	LIU B C , WANG T , WU Q S , et al. Bistatic SAR data focusing using an omega-K algorithm based on method of series reversion[J]. IEEE Trans.on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2009, 47 (8): 2899- 2912. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2017522
18	WRIGHT S J , NOWAK R D , FIGUEIREDO M A . Sparse reconstruction by separable approximation[J]. IEEE Trans.on Signal Processing, 2009, 57 (7): 2479- 2493. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2009.2016892
19	BLUMENSATH T , DAVIES M E . Iterative hard thresholding for compressed sensing[J]. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 2009, 27 (3): 265- 274.
20	ONHON N Ö , CETIN M . A sparsity-driven approach for joint SAR imaging and phase error correction[J]. IEEE Trans.on Image Processing, 2012, 21 (4): 2075- 2088.
21	VAN R W , OTTEN M , VAN B R . Extended PGA for range migration algorithms[J]. IEEE Trans.on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2006, 42 (2): 478- 488. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2006.1642565

仿真参数	取值
载频/GHz	17
距离带宽/MHz	200
合成孔径时间/s	3
脉冲宽度/μs	5
脉冲重复频率/kHz	1.5
斜视角/(°)	60
平台高度/km	4
中心斜距/km	13
速度/(m/s)	(150, 0, -35)
加速度/(m/s²)	(2.2, 1.2, -0.8)

采样率	成像方法	IRW	PSLR/dB	ISLR/dB
1	PIO-MF-SAR	5.48	-13.24	-9.83
	PIO-SR-SAR	4.93	-22.01	-23.68
	PIO-NSR-SAR	5.21	-16.81	-14.11
0.25	PIO-MF-SAR	5.46	-13.44	-6.58
	PIO-SR-SAR	4.90	-22.41	-24.44
	PIO-NSR-SAR	5.08	-18.71	-17.52
0.09	PIO-MF-SAR	5.45	-13.04	-4.16
	PIO-SR-SAR	4.88	-22.48	-24.93
	PIO-NSR-SAR	4.98	-20.35	-19.27

成像方法	点目标	IRW	PSLR/dB	ISLR/dB
PIO-MF-SAR	3	6.24	-12.90	-10.3
	5	5.48	-13.24	-9.86
	7	4.68	-13.01	-10.23
RIO-MF-SAR	3	15.21	-0.84	-1.48
	5	5.48	-13.24	-9.86
	7	5.21	-7.06	-7.37

[1]	田鹤, 董纯柱, 殷红成. 基于频域稀疏压缩感知的雷达目标三维散射中心反演方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(9): 2783-2790.
[2]	谢艾伦, 刘晓斌, 赵锋, 艾小锋, 肖顺平. 辐射式仿真中PCM信号间歇收发回波重构方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(3): 771-776.
[3]	方澄, 李慧娟, 路稳, 宋玉蒙, 杨磊. 基于形态学自适应分块的高分辨SAR多特征增强算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(2): 470-479.
[4]	李海, 呼延泽, 毛志杰. 强杂波下基于压缩感知的低空风切变速度解模糊[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(10): 3029-3036.
[5]	熊世超, 倪嘉成, 张群, 罗迎. 基于频谱旋转ωk算法的大斜视SAR地面动目标成像[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(10): 3104-3114.
[6]	马啸宇, 张金生, 李婷. 基于蔡氏电路和压缩感知的图像压缩加密方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(9): 2407-2412.
[7]	阮锋, 郭亮, 李亚超, 许然. 基于关联计算的相控阵雷达前视成像技术[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(9): 2457-2462.
[8]	李冬霞, 陈秋雨, 王磊, 刘海涛. 基于BSBL-BO算法的DME脉冲干扰抑制方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(9): 2649-2656.
[9]	庄陵, 叶华双. 改进的压缩感知限幅噪声消除方案[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(8): 2341-2346.
[10]	黄天耀, 李宇涵, 王磊, 刘一民, 王希勤. 相参频率捷变雷达目标稀疏重建性能边界综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(7): 1729-1736.
[11]	杨卫星, 朱岱寅. 稀疏场景下SAR方位向随机丢失数据的迭代成像算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(7): 1748-1755.
[12]	张子鑫, 胡国平, 周豪, 占成宏. 基于互协方差稀疏重构的MIMO雷达低仰角估计算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(5): 1218-1223.
[13]	薛东方, 朱晓秀, 胡文华, 郭宝锋, 曾慧燕. 基于加权l₁范数优化的双基地ISAR稀疏成像算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(4): 944-953.
[14]	赵迎新, 王长峰, 吴虹, 张铭, 黄英杰, 王乐耕, 刘之洋. 基于负熵最大化的压缩感知信道估计算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(4): 1126-1132.
[15]	李贵勇, 于敏, 余永坤. 大规模MIMO系统中分布式压缩感知LMMSE信道估计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(3): 823-831.