基于DoDAF的智能网联装备体系任务−通信耦合结构建模与仿真验证

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2026.08.15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对智能网联装备体系（intelligent networked equipment system of systems，INESoS ）网络通信与体系结构耦合关系的建模与仿真验证问题，提出基于国防部体系结构框架（department of defense architecture framework，DoDAF）的INESoS任务?通信耦合结构建模与验证方法。所提方法基于任务?通信耦合结构剪裁DoDAF模型，并面向耦合度开展模型验证。最后，基于有人/无人协同的INESoS进行案例分析。案例分析结果表明耦合度越大，INESoS的网联程度越高，通信能力与任务能力关系越紧密。INESoS网联化要求更冗余的通信拓扑结构和更多的通信单元设备，以保证体系任务的成功执行。

关键词: 耦合结构建模, 国防部体系结构框架, 智能网联装备体系, 通信网络

Abstract:

Aiming at modeling and simulation verification problem of the coupling relationship between network communication and architecture in the intelligent networked equipment system of systems （INESoS）, the paper proposes a modeling and verification method of mission-communication coupling structure for INESoS based on the department of defense architecture framework （DoDAF）. The proposed method customizes DoDAF models based on the mission-communication coupling structure, and model validation is performed through the analysis of coupling measurement. Finally, a case study is conducted on the INESoS for manned/unmanned collaboration. The conclusion indicates that a higher coupling degree corresponds to an increased networking level of INESoS, reflecting a stronger interdependence between communication capability and mission capability. Furthermore, achieving effective networking in INESoS necessitates a more redundant communication topology and a greater number of communication unit devices to ensure the successful execution of its missions.

Key words: coupling structure modeling, department of defense architecture framework （DoDAF）, intelligent networked equipment system of systems, communication network

中图分类号:

TB 114.3

党宇恒, 潘星, 刘铃泽. 基于DoDAF的智能网联装备体系任务−通信耦合结构建模与仿真验证[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(8): 2669-2679.

Yuheng DANG, Xing PAN, Lingze LIU. Mission-communication coupling structure modeling and simulation verification of intelligent networked equipment SoS based DoDAF[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(8): 2669-2679.

图/表 14

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

表1

图12

表2

参考文献 31

1	LIN M L, CHEN T, REN B B, et al. CADer: a deep reinforcement learning approach for designing the communication architecture of system of systems[J]. IEEE Trans. on Intelligent Vehicles, 2023, 8 (5): 3405- 3417. doi: 10.1109/TIV.2023.3236104
2	XU R J, LIU J H, LI J C, et al. TSoSRA: a task-oriented resilience assessment framework for system-of-systems[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2024, 248, 110186.
3	LI Q, CUI L J, WANG Q, et al. Construction and application of an agent-based intelligent operation and maintenance system for UAV[J]. Drones, 2025, 9 (4): 309. doi: 10.3390/drones9040309
4	PAN X, WANG H X, YANG Y J, et al. Resilience based importance measure analysis for SoS[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 30 (5): 920- 930. doi: 10.21629/JSEE.2019.05.10
5	LI J C, TAN Y J, YANG K W, et al. Structural robustness of combat networks of weapon system-of-systems based on the operation loop[J]. International Journal of Systems Science, 2016, 48 (3): 659- 674.
6	LE V H, NGUYEN T T, NGUYEN K K. Dual wireless anti-interception for ground combat vehicles[J]. IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology, 2024, 72 (12): 16236- 16248.
7	TRAN H T, DOMERCANT J C, MAVRIS D N. Evaluating the agility of adaptive command and control networks from a cyber complex adaptive systems perspective[J]. Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, 2015, 12 (4): 405- 422. doi: 10.1177/1548512915592517
8	ZENG C Y, LIU H F, LU L A, et al. SHATTER: searching heterogeneous combat network attack sequences through network embedding and reinforcement learning[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2023: 17: 4497−4508.
9	潘星, 张振宇, 张曼丽, 等. 基于SoSE的装备体系RMS论证方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (8): 1771- 1779. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2019.08.14
	PAN X, ZHANG Z Y, ZHANG M L, et al. Research on RMS demonstration method of equipment SoS based on SoSE[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (8): 1771- 1779. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2019.08.14
10	LI M H, PAN X, ZHANG N M, et al. Reliability of system-of-systems: a new challenge of complex engineered systems[J]. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2025, 12 (2): 434- 441. doi: 10.1007/s42524-025-4244-6
11	WEI L I, WANG Y, JIA L, et al. Battlefield target intelligence system architecture modeling and system optimization[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 35 (5): 1190- 1210. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2024.000114
12	AXELSSON J. Implications of second-order cybernetics and autopoiesis on systems-of-systems engineering[J]. Systems, 2025, 13 (2): 119. doi: 10.3390/systems13020119
13	PAPAVASILIOU S, GOROD A, REAICHE C. System of systems engineering governance framework for digital transformation: a case study of an Australian large government agency[J]. Systems Engineering, 2024, 27 (2): 267- 283. doi: 10.1002/sys.21719
14	WU S X, WANG G X, LU J Z, et al. Design ontology for cognitive thread supporting traceability management in model-based systems engineering[J]. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 2024, 40, 100619. doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2024.100619
15	潘星, 尹宝石, 温晓华. 基于DoDAF的装备体系任务建模与仿真[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2012, 34 (9): 1846- 1851. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2012.09.17
	PAN X, YIN B S, WEN X H. Mission modeling and simulation for equipment system of systems based on DoDAF[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34 (9): 1846- 1851. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2012.09.17
16	潘星, 黄元星, 尹宝石. 基于功能和联接的装备体系结构[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2012, 34 (10): 2052- 2057.
	PAN X, HUANG Y X, YIN B S. Equipment system of systems architecture based on function and connection[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34 (10): 2052- 2057.
17	DOD. Systems engineering guide for systems of systems [M]. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Defense (DoD), 2008.
18	ZHANG X X, LUO A M, MAO Y, et al. A semi-automatic optimization design method for SvcV-5 in DoDAF 2.0 based on service identification[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 33442- 33460. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2970446
19	GE B F, HIPEL K W, YANG K W, et al. A novel executable modeling approach for system-of-systems architecture[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2014, 8 (1): 4- 13. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2013.2270573
20	TAO Z G, LUO Y F, CHEN C X, et al. Enterprise application architecture development based on DoDAF and TOGAF[J]. Enterprise Information Systems, 2015, 11 (1/5): 627- 651.
21	FANG Z M, ZHAO X M, LI F Y. Architecture design space generation via decision pattern-guided department of defense architecture framework modeling[J]. Systems, 2024, 12 (9): 336. doi: 10.3390/systems12090336
22	ZHAN Z J, WANG Y H, LI B F, et al. Architecture design of air-sea joint combat system based on DoDAF[C]// Proc. of the Annual Conference of Chinese Society of Optical Engineering, 2019.
23	陈志伟, 张罗庚, 方晓彤, 等. 装备体系可靠性概念、建模与预计方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46 (6): 1975- 1985.
	CHEN Z W, ZHANG L G, FANG X T, et al. Reliability concepts, modeling, and prediction methods for weapon system of systems[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46 (6): 1975- 1985.
24	张维明, 刘忠, 阳东升, 等. 体系工程理论与方法[M]. 4版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.
	ZHANG W M, LIU Z, YANG D S, et al. The theory and methods of system of systems engineering[M]. 4th ed. Beijing: Science Press, 2010.
25	CHEN Z W, ZHOU Z M, ZHANG L G, et al. Mission reliability modeling and evaluation for reconfigurable unmanned weapon system-of-systems based on effective operation loop[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 34 (3): 588- 597. doi: 10.23919/JSEE.2023.000082
26	CHERFA I, BELLOIR N, SADOU S, et al. Systems of systems: from mission definition to architecture description[J]. Systems Engineering, 2019, 22 (6): 437- 454. doi: 10.1002/sys.21523
27	CHEN J, ZHA D S, GAO K, et al. Model-based approach for civil aviation material support system modeling[J]. Systems Engineering, 2025, 28(4): 557−576.
28	GRIENDLING K, MAVRIS D N. Development of a DoDAF-based executable architecting approach to analyze system-of-systems alternatives[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2011.
29	PAN X, YIN B S, HU J. Modeling and simulation for SoS based on the DoDAF framework[C]//Proc. of the 9th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety, 2011: 1283−1287.
30	TAI X. Simulation evaluation and case study verification of equipment system of systems support effectiveness[J]. Systems, 2025, 13 (2): 77. doi: 10.3390/systems13020077
31	黄宁, 伍志韬. 网络可靠性评估模型与算法综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2013, 35 (12): 2651- 2660. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2013.12.32
	HUANG N, WU Z T. Survey of network reliability evaluation models and algorithms[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 35 (12): 2651- 2660. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2013.12.32

指标项	初始体系结构指标结果	优化后体系结构指标结果
耦合度	0.103	0.119
控制指令−通信能力	0.761	0.780
起飞指令−通信能力	0.892	0.901
轨迹指令−通信能力	0.643	0.977
任务指令−通信能力	0.824	0.810
评估数据−通信能力	0.772	0.76
返航指令−通信能力	0.803	0.831
任务能力	0.640	0.790

体系结构	耦合度	任务能力
初始体系结构	0.103	0.640
优化后的体系结构	0.119	0.790
体系结构（增加评估数据通信业务冗余）	0.131	0.882
体系结构（增加控制指令通信业务冗余）	0.150	0.938

[1]	陈禧龙, 张臻, 于冬梅, 赵河明, 张楚雷. 基于DoDAF-DSM的有/无人协同作战体系设计方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2026, 48(7): 2378-2393.
[2]	陈成, 张祥瑞, 杨中源, 周华伟, 何秦, 韩灿. 基于DoDAF的舰船实战化需求建模与分析方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2025, 47(10): 3389-3400.
[3]	杨芷柔, 张虎, 刘静, 刘同林. 节点攻击策略下的军事通信网络结构优化算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(7): 1848-1855.
[4]	刘同林, 杨芷柔, 张虎, 滕祥意, 刘静. 基于复杂网络的军事通信网络建模与性能分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(12): 2892-2898.
[5]	王新尧, 曹云峰, 孙厚俊, 韦彩色, 陶江. 基于DoDAF的有人/无人机协同作战体系结构建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(10): 2265-2274.
[6]	李大喜, 张强, 李小喜, 许勇, 杨建军. 基于DoDAF的空基反导装备体系结构建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(5): 1036-1041.
[7]	张超,张凤鸣,王瑛,吴虎胜. 基于复杂网络视角的航空通信网络鲁棒性分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2015, 37(1): 180-184.
[8]	李志淮，谭贤四，王红，李桂祥. 基于DM2的体系结构数据一致性验证方法[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 35(2): 357-361.
[9]	李硕, 黄宁, 李瑞莹, 康锐. 通信网络服务可靠性参数分析[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34(9): 1946-1950.
[10]	包学才，戴伏生，韩卫占. 基于拓扑的不相交路径抗毁性评估方法[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34(1): 168-174.
[11]	倪枫，王明哲，周丰，杨翠蓉. 可执行体系结构的HCPN建模方法[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(5): 959-965.