异构编队卫星近距离操作轨迹规划方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2024.03.31

Abstract

Abstract:

In view of the on-orbit service mission using formation satellites, a cooperative operation scheme for the multi payload heterogeneous satellite cluster is proposed. Firstly, considering the inter-satellite autonomous communication, a formation system consisting of an observation satellite for main fault identification and several operational satellites for main maintenance and replenishment is established. Secondly, a multi-satellite cooperative trajectory planning method based on cyclic alternating strategy is proposed, and the satellite trajectories are optimized based on differential evolution algorithm. Finally, combined with case simulation, the impulses required by each member satellite in the formation control process and the overall safety performance of the system are analyzed. The simulation results show that the heterogeneous formation system can quickly plan the in-orbit service trajectory with high safety and robustness, which has certain engineering application value.

Key words: on-orbit service, formation flying, proximity operation, evolutionary algorithm

CLC Number:

V412.4

Hanwei WANG, Jiacheng ZHANG, Yuehe ZHU. A trajectory planning method for proximity operations of heterogeneous formation satellites[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(3): 1048-1057.

Figures/Tables 17

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Table 1

Fig.4

Fig.5

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

References 31

1	黄攀峰, 常海涛, 鹿振宇, 等. 面向在轨服务的可重构细胞卫星关键技术与展望[J]. 宇航学报, 2016, 37 (1): 1- 10.
	HUANG P F , CHANG H T , LU Z Y , et al. Key techniques of on-orbit service-oriented reconfigurable ceilularized satellite and its prospects[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2016, 37 (1): 1- 10.
2	TRUSZKOWSKI W F , HINCHEY M G , RASH J L , et al. Autonomous and autonomic systems: a paradigm for future space exploration missions[J]. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C, 2006, 36 (3): 279- 291. doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2006.871600
3	LI W J , CHENG D Y , LIU X G , et al. On-orbit service (OOS) of spacecraft: a review of engineering developments[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2019, 108, 32- 120. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.01.004
4	HATTY I . Viability of on-orbit servicing spacecraft to prolong the operational life of satellites[J]. Journal of Space Safety Engineering, 2022, 9 (2): 263- 268. doi: 10.1016/j.jsse.2022.02.011
5	HABLANI H B , TAPPER M L , DANA-BASHIAN D J . Gui-dance and relative navigation for autonomous rendezvous in a circular orbit[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2002, 25 (3): 553- 562. doi: 10.2514/2.4916
6	ZHANG R , HAN C , RAO Y R , et al. Spacecraft fast fly-around formations design using the bi-teardrop configuration[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2018, 41 (7): 1542- 1555. doi: 10.2514/1.G003236
7	李学辉, 宋申民. 慢旋非合作目标快速绕飞避碰控制[J]. 控制与决策, 2018, 33 (9): 1612- 1618.
	LI X H , SONG S M . Slowly rotating non-cooperative target fast fly-around collision avoidance control[J]. Control and Decision, 2018, 33 (9): 1612- 1618.
8	陶佳伟, 张涛. 具有预设性能的近距离星间相对姿轨耦合控制[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (5): 1103- 1109.
	TAO J W , ZHANG T . Coupled control of relative position and attitude for spacecraft proximity operations with prescribed performance[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (5): 1103- 1109.
9	SUN Z J , LUO Y Z , NIU Z Y . Spacecraft rendezvous trajectory safety quantitative performance index eliminating probability dilution[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2014, 57 (6): 1219- 1228. doi: 10.1007/s11431-014-5523-3
10	LUO Y Z , SUN Z J , ZHANG J . Proximity scenario design for geostationary rendezvous with collocated satellite avoidance[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2019, 154, 153- 168. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.11.004
11	DANG Z H , FAN L , WANG Z K , et al. On the maximal and minimal distances of flying-around satellite formation[J]. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 2017, 89 (9): 845- 852.
12	HU Z L , YANG J Y . Distributed optimal formation algorithm for multi-satellites system with time-varying performance function[J]. International Journal of Control, 2020, 93 (5): 1015- 1026. doi: 10.1080/00207179.2018.1486512
13	CHEN A J , REN J D , WANG Z H , et al. Optimal satellite formation reconfiguration based on the uncertainty and distur-bance estimator[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2022, 70 (7): 2013- 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2022.06.050
14	ALEJANDRO M M , FRANCESCA S , CAMILLA C . Manoeuvre planning algorithm for satellite formations using mean relative orbital elements[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2022, 71 (1): 585- 603.
15	PARENTE D , SPILLER , D , CURTI F . Time-suboptimal sate-llite formation maneuvers using inverse dynamics and differen-tial evolution[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dyna-mics, 2018, 41 (5): 1108- 1121. doi: 10.2514/1.G003110
16	严冰, 张进, 罗亚中. 面向编队卫星的空间系绳在轨服务[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43 (3): 806- 813.
	YAN B , ZHANG J , LUO Y Z . On-orbit service for formation satellites with space tether[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43 (3): 806- 813.
17	LEE D , SANYAL A K , BUTCHER E A , et al. Asymptotic tracking control for spacecraft formation flying with decentra-lized collision avoidance[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2015, 38 (4): 587- 600. doi: 10.2514/1.G000101
18	李思远, 叶东, 孙兆伟. 考虑通信延迟的卫星集群改进蜂拥控制[J]. 宇航学报, 2022, 43 (8): 1097- 1108.
	LI S Y , YE D , SUN Z W . Improved flocking control for sate-llite cluster with communication delays[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2022, 43 (8): 1097- 1108.
19	HAO Z W , YUE X K , WEN H W , et al. Full-state-constrained non-certainty-equivalent adaptive control for satellite swarm subject to input fault[J]. Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2022, 9 (3): 482- 495.
20	徐影, 张进. 旋转目标的多星协同近距离姿轨耦合控制[J]. 动力学与控制学报, 2021, 19 (2): 22- 31.
	XU Y , ZHANG J . Attitude-orbit coupling method for multisatellite collaborative proximity control of rotating target[J]. Journal of Dynamics and Control, 2021, 19 (2): 22- 31.
21	BENNETT T , SCHAUB H , ROSCOE C W T . Faster-than-natural spacecraft circumnavigation via way points[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2016, 123, 376- 386. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.01.025
22	AHMED M O , DAE-KWAN K . Real-time fuel optimization and guidance for spacecraft rendezvous and docking[J]. Aerospace, 2022, 9 (5): 276- 293. doi: 10.3390/aerospace9050276
23	SHAMIL B , GLEB B , DMITRY P . Satellite formation flying for space advertising: from technically feasible to economically viable[J]. Aerospace, 2022, 9 (8): 419- 445. doi: 10.3390/aerospace9080419
24	BIKTIMIROV S , IVANOV D , PRITYKIN D . A satellite formation to display pixel images from the sky: mission design and control algorithms[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2022, 69 (11): 4026- 4044. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2022.03.018
25	STORN R , PRICE K V . Differential evolution—a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces[J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 1997, 11 (4): 341- 359. doi: 10.1023/A:1008202821328
26	张冉, 殷建丰, 韩潮. 航天器受迫绕飞构型设计与控制[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43 (10): 2030- 2039.
	ZHANG R , YIN J F , HAN C . Spacecraft forced fly-around formation design and control[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronsutics, 2017, 43 (10): 2030- 2039.
27	HANCHEOL C . Energy-optimal reconfiguration of satellite formation flying in the presence of uncertainties[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2021, 67 (5): 1454- 1467. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2020.11.036
28	SARNO S , GUO J , D'ERRICO M , et al. A guidance approach to satellite formation reconfiguration based on convex optimization and genetic algorithms[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2020, 65 (8): 2003- 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2020.01.033
29	CASTRO-PALACIO J C , ISIDRO J M , NAVARRO-PARDO E , et al. Monte carlo simulation of a modified chi distribution with unequal variances in the generating Gaussians: a discrete methodology to study collective response times[J]. Mathematics, 2021, 9 (1): 77.
30	YI B , GU D F , CHANG X , et al. Integrating BDS and GPS for precise relative orbit determination of LEO formation flying[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31 (10): 2013- 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2018.06.001
31	CORY T F , STEVE U . Adaptive extended Kalman filtering strategies for spacecraft formation relative navigation[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2021, 178, 700- 721. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.10.016

参数	数值
目标轨道周期T₀/s	86 400
快速绕飞周期T/s	28 800
观测卫星对目标的期望绕飞半径R₁/m	5 000
操作卫星对观测卫星的绕飞半径R₂/m	1 000
绕飞期间卫星与目标最小距离/m	2 600
抵近交会转移时间/s	3 600
撤离重组转移时间/s	5 400

参数	数值
编队初始相位/(°)	220.901
第1段转移时间/s	10 407.893
第2段转移时间/s	10 546.165
第3段转移时间/s	78 459.412
操控星1初始相位/(°)	204.707
第1段转移相位/(°)	139.985
第2段转移相位/(°)	139.984
第3段转移相位/(°)	103.563

参数	数值
编队初始相位/(°)	0
第1段转移时间/s	9 600
第2段转移时间/s	9 600
第3段转移时间/s	9 600
操控星1初始相位/(°)	0
第1段转移相位/(°)	120
第2段转移相位/(°)	120
第3段转移相位/(°)	120

参数	本文方法	EAET方法
编队绕飞单圈总速度增量	19.663	20.760
观测卫星绕飞单圈所需总速度增量	4.907	5.192
操作卫星绕飞单圈所需速度增量平均值	4.918	5.272
操作卫星1绕飞单圈所需总速度增量	4.824	5.305
操作卫星2绕飞单圈所需总速度增量	5.017	5.134
操作卫星3绕飞单圈所需总速度增量	4.914	5.136

[1]	Yong DENG, Feng YAO, Lining XING, Lei HE. Inter-satellite data transmission method in satellite network based on hybrid evolutionary algorithm [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(9): 2931-2940.
[2]	Junkui TANG, Zheng LIU, Rong XIE, Bo ZENG. Optimal design method for sparse array of MIMO radar [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(12): 3661-3666.
[3]	Hanyang WANG, Liang CHEN, Hai XU, Jingbo BAI. UAV online trajectory planning based on MOEA/D-ARMS [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(11): 3505-3514.
[4]	Jing ZHOU, Xiaozhe ZHAO, Zhen XU, Zhong LIN, Xiaopan ZHANG. Many-objective task allocation method based on D-NSGA-Ⅲ algorithm for multi-UAVs [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(5): 1240-1247.
[5]	Bing YAN, Jin ZHANG, Yazhong LUO. On-orbit service for formation satellites with space tether [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(3): 806-813.
[6]	Qingguo LIU, Xinxue LIU, Jian WU, Yaxiong LI, Hao CHEN. Optimization of fire distribution for multiple SGSW based on improved NSGA-Ⅲ [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(9): 1995-2002.
[7]	Minjian YU, Huiming JI, Qisong HAN, Wei BI. Multi-aircraft air combat target allocation based on cooperative co-evolutionary [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(6): 1290-1300.
[8]	Wubin MA, Rui WANG, Weichao WANG, Yahui WU, Su DENG, Hongbin HUANG. Micro-service composition deployment and scheduling strategy based on evolutionary multi-objective optimization [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(1): 90-100.
[9]	WANG Yadong, SHI Quan, ZHANG Fang, YOU Zhifeng, XIA Wei. Multi-stage spare parts supply optimization based on dynamic evolutionary algorithm [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(11): 2514-2523.
[10]	FANG Wei, ZHANG Lingzhi. Learning of fuzzy cognitive maps using multi-objective evolutionary algorithm [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(2): 447-455.
[11]	ZHANG Ying, YANG Ren-nong, ZUO Jia-liang, JING Xiao-ning. Tactic maneuver planning of loft delivery of laser-guided bomb with no offset [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38(5): 1074-.
[12]	CHEN Yan-long, ZHANG Pei-lin, LI Sheng, LI Yi-ning. Adaptive niche quantum evolutionary algorithm for multimodal function [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 36(2): 403-408.
[13]	ZHANG Ying， YANG Rennong， ZUO Jialiang， JING Xiaoning. Weapontarget assignment based on decompositionbased evolutionary#br# multiobjective optimization algorithms [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 36(12): 2435-2441.
[14]	MA Ke-xin， WANG Hui-nan. Dualquaternion relative position and attitude estimation algorithm of close formation flight based on vision [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 35(2): 391-396.
[15]	DONG Xiao-guang， CAO Xi-bin， ZHANG Jin-xiu， SHI Li. Optimal relative trajectory generation and tracking control of formation flying [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 35(1): 138-145.

A trajectory planning method for proximity operations of heterogeneous formation satellites

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 17

References 31

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments