基于功能依赖网的体系效能评估方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.07.15

Abstract

Abstract:

Developing effective combat system-of-systems (SoS) requires appropriate effectiveness evaluation methods. However, most current evaluation methods are short of capturing the complex interdependencies. This paper thus brings in a functional dependency network analysis (FDNA) method that is able to depict the interdependency relationship and its cascading effects within an SoS, using two interdependency parameters and a piece-wise linear model. This paper keeps the advantages of FDNA while overcoming some of the shortfalls. Particularly, this paper proposes operation loop based modeling rules for building functional dependency network of combat SoSs. Meanwhile, this paper adjusts and completes the effectiveness aggregation model through adding interdependency health index, synthetic criticality of dependency, and multi-systems redundancy voting system. This new extended FDNA (E-FDNA) method is able to reflect the SoS effectiveness under more combat scenarios. In the end, the E-FDNA method is applied to a naval air and missile SoS. The comparison with current FDNA related methods and complex network theory method, regarding the effectiveness value and critical system identification respectively, demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of the E-FDNA method. Hence the proposed E-FDNA method offers a new method for SoS effectiveness evaluation.

Key words: combat system-of-systems (SoS), effectiveness evaluation, functional dependency network analysis (FDNA)

CLC Number:

N945.12

Shunqi HUAN, Zhemei FAN, Jianbo WANG. System-of-systems effectiveness evaluation method based on functional dependency network[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(7): 2191-2200.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig.1

Table 1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

References 30

1	罗鹏程, 周经伦, 金光. 武器装备体系作战效能与作战能力评估分析方法[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2014: 3- 4.
	LUO P C , ZHOU J L , JIN G . Evaluation and analysis method of combat effectiveness and combat capability of weapon and equipment system[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2014: 3- 4.
2	RAZ A K , KENLEY C R , DELAURENTIS D . A system-of-systems perspective for information fusion system design and evaluation[J]. Information Fusion, 2017, 35, 148- 165. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2016.10.002
3	MOUR A, KENLEY C R, DAVENDRALINGAM N, et al. Agent-based modeling for systems of systems[C]//Proc. of the 23rd INCOSE International Symposium, 2013.
4	FRY D N, CAMPBELL R, DELAURENTIS D. Modeling system-of-systems from multiple design perspectives: agents, interfaces, and architectures[C]//Proc. of the AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, 2015.
5	任俊, 胡晓峰, 朱丰. 基于深度学习特征迁移的装备体系效能预测[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39 (12): 2745- 2749. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2017.12.17
	REN J , HU X F , ZHU F . Effectiveness prediction of weapon equipment system-of-systems based on deep learning feature transfer[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39 (12): 2745- 2749. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2017.12.17
6	KIM T G , KANG B G , SEO K M . Communication analysis of network-centric warfare via transformation of system of systems model into integrated system model using neural network[J]. Complexity, 2018, doi: 10.1155/2018/6201356
7	RAZ A K , WOOD P C , MOCKUS L , et al. System of systems uncertainty quantification using machine learning techniques with smart grid application[J]. Systems Engineering, 2020, 23 (6): 770- 782. doi: 10.1002/sys.21561
8	殷小静, 胡晓峰, 刘戎翔, 等. 基于GAN的体系能力图谱生成方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42 (10): 2257- 2264. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.10.14
	YIN X J , HU X F , LIU R X , et al. Generative method of SOS capability maps based on GAN[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42 (10): 2257- 2264. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.10.14
9	LI J C , TAN Y J , YANG K W , et al. Structural robustness of combat networks of weapon system-of-systems based on the ope-ration loop[J]. International Journal of Systems Science, 2017, 48 (3): 659- 674. doi: 10.1080/00207721.2016.1212429
10	CHEN K B , LU Y J , LIU Q , et al. A method to validate ope-rational capability index model of heterogeneous combat networks based on characteristic topology analysis[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 59760- 59773. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2983082
11	POTTS M W , SARTOR P A , JOHNSON A , et al. A network perspective on assessing system architectures: foundations and challenges[J]. Systems Engineering, 2019, 22 (6): 485- 501. doi: 10.1002/sys.21519
12	POTTS M W , SARTOR P A , JOHNSON A , et al. A network perspective on assessing system architectures: robustness to cascading failure[J]. Systems Engineering, 2020, 23 (5): 597- 616.
13	GARVEY P R, PINTO C A. Introduction to functional dependency network analysis[C]//Proc. of the 2nd International Symposium on Engineering Systems Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2009.
14	GUARINIELLO C , DELAURENTIS D . Supporting design via the system operational dependency analysis methodology[J]. Research in Engineering Design, 2016, 28 (1): 53- 69.
15	GUARINIELLO C, GRANDE M, BRAND C, et al. Quantifying the impact of systems interdependencies in space systems architectures[C]//Proc. of the 70th International Astronautical Congress, 2019: 21-25.
16	GUARINIELLO C , DELAURENTIS D . Dependency analysis of system-of-systems operational and development networks[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2013, 16, 265- 274. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.028
17	GUARINIELLO C , DELAURENTIS D . Communications, information, and cyber security in systems-of-systems: assessing the impact of attacks through interdependency analysis[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2014, 28, 720- 727. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2014.03.086
18	GUARINIELLO C , RAZ A K , FANG Z , et al. System-of-systems tools and techniques for the analysis of cyber-physical systems[J]. Systems Engineering, 2020, 23 (4): 480- 491. doi: 10.1002/sys.21539
19	孙丽杰, 王剑波, 罗云峰, 等. 体系功能依赖网络参数获取及应用[J]. 兵工自动化, 2018, 37 (1): 40- 44. 40-44, 54
	SUN L J , WANG J B , LUO Y F , et al. Acquisition and application of functional dependency network parameters for system of systems[J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2018, 37 (1): 40- 44.40-44, 54
20	张旺勋. 基于复杂交互网络的武器装备体系安全性分析方法[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2015: 86-88.
	ZHANG W X. A weapon system of systems safety analysis method based on complex interaction networks[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2015: 86-88.
21	LUO A M, YI S H, LIU J X, et al. An improved functional dependency network model for information systems effectiveness analysis[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Wireless Communication and Sensor Networks, 2020: 56-59.
22	陈宇奇, 徐廷学, 郝建平, 等. 基于FDN的装备体系任务能力依赖性分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43 (6): 1721- 1728.
	CHEN Y Q , XU T X , HAO J P , et al. Task capability dependency analysis of weapon system of systems based on FDN[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43 (6): 1721- 1728.
23	陈玉金, 徐吉辉, 史佳辉, 等. 基于FDNA的飞行器系统安全涌现失效模型研究[J]. 电光与控制, 2021, 28 (8): 96- 100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2021.08.020
	CHEN Y J , XU J H , SHI J H , et al. Research on safety emergent failure of aircraft system based on FDNA[J]. Electronics Optics & Control, 2021, 28 (8): 96- 100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2021.08.020
24	王哲, 李建华, 刘子杨, 等. 基于功能依赖的网络信息体系建模及重心分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43 (10): 2876- 2883. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.10.22
	WANG Z , LI J H , LIU Z Y , et al. Modeling and center of gravity analysis for networked information system of system based on function dependency[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43 (10): 2876- 2883. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.10.22
25	DELLER S , BOWLING S R , RABADI G A , et al. Applying the information age combat model: quantitative analysis of network centric operations[J]. The International C2 Journal, 2009, 3 (1): 1- 25.
26	谭跃进, 张小可, 杨克巍. 武器装备体系网络化描述与建模方法[J]. 系统管理学报, 2012, 21 (6): 781- 786. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2542.2012.06.009
	TAN Y J , ZHANG X K , YANG K W . Research on networked description and modeling methods of armament system-of-systems[J]. Journal of Systems & Management, 2012, 21 (6): 781- 786. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2542.2012.06.009
27	LI J C , GE B F , ZHAO D L , et al. Meta-path-based weapon-target recommendation in heterogeneous combat network[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2019, 13 (4): 4433- 4441. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2018.2890090
28	JAMSHIDI M . Systems of systems engineering: principles and applications[M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2017.
29	郭琳琳, 彭芃, 张建英. 美国航空母舰编队作战能力分析[J]. 雷达与对抗, 2017, 37 (3): 17- 23.
	GUO L L , PENG P , ZHANG J Y . Analysis on combat capability of American carrier strike groups[J]. Radar & ECM, 2017, 37 (3): 17- 23.
30	WINSTEAD P J. Implementation of unmanned surface vehicles in the distributed maritime operations concept[D]. Monterey: Naval Postgraduate School, 2018.

编号	连接规则	描述
1	S→D	传感器节点发送信息给决策节点
2	S→S	传感器节点之间共享信息
3	S→I	传感器将信息发送给打击节点
4	D→I	决策节点将指令或经处理计算后的目标信息发送给打击节点
5	D→D	决策节点之间共享信息
6	A→S	辅助节点为传感器节点提供保障
7	A→D	辅助节点为决策节点提供保障
8	A→I	辅助节点为打击节点提供保障

编号	节点名称	描述	节点类型
1	CVN指控	航母指控功能	D
2	DDG探测1	1号驱逐舰的探测功能	S
3	DDG指控2	1号驱逐舰的指控功能	D
4	DDG指控1	2号驱逐舰的指控功能	D
5	DDG探测2	2号驱逐舰的探测功能	S
6	E-2D探测1	1号预警机的探测功能	S
7	E-2D指控1	1号预警机的指控功能	D
8	E-2D指控2	2号预警机的指控功能	D
9	E-2D探测2	2号预警机的探测功能	S
10	F-35 1	1号F-35战斗机	S
11	EA-18G	电子战飞机	I
12	F-35 2	2号F-35战斗机	S
13~17	F/A-18 1/2/3/4/5	1到5号F/A-18	I
18	UCLASS	负责空中加油的无人机	A
19	CVN保障	航母综合保障功能	A
20	拦截能力	海上防空反导体系拦截能力	C

节点编号	β_S	β_D	β_I	β_A
3、4	15	-	-	-
6、9	40	-	-	-
7、8	10	10	-	-
11	-	5	5	-
13~17	10	5	-	40
20	-	-	0	-

想定	FDNA	SE-FDNA	HI-FDNA	E-FDNA
想定1	95.77	95.77	95.77	92.42
想定2	-	84.66	84.66	79.96
想定3	-	67.65	38.46	16.56
想定4	-	76.56	33.46	90.11

节点名称	体系效能下降绝对值	波及范围
E-2D指控1	71.26	0.4
E-2D指控2	71.26	0.4
EA/18G	42.5	0.1
E-2D探测1	40.29	0.55
E-2D探测2	40.29	0.55
F-35 1	35.79	0.25
F-35 2	35.79	0.25
CVN保障	24.92	0.35
DDG指控2	11.28	0.15
DDG指控1	11.28	0.15
DDG探测1	2.33	0.1
DDG探测2	2.33	0.1
UCLASS	1.79	0.05
F/A-18 1-5	0.8	0.05
CVN指控	0.31	0.15

System-of-systems effectiveness evaluation method based on functional dependency network

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 30

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

节点名称	特征向量中心性	介数中心性	度中心性	相对重要性
E-2D指控1	0.076	18.500	0.550	0.798
E-2D指控2	0.076	18.500	0.550	0.798
F/A-18	0.192	1.967	0.350	0.581
EA/18G	0.173	3.167	0.250	0.509
E-2D探测1	0.003	9.000	0.500	0.470
E-2D探测2	0.003	9.000	0.500	0.470
DDG指控2	0.020	5.500	0.350	0.346
DDG指控1	0.020	5.500	0.350	0.346
UCLASS	0.001	0.000	0.300	0.184
CVN保障	0.000	0.000	0.300	0.182
DDG探测1	0.000	0.000	0.200	0.121
DDG探测2	0.000	0.000	0.200	0.121
F-35 1	0.000	0.000	0.150	0.091
F-35 2	0.000	0.000	0.150	0.091
CVN指控	0.000	0.000	0.100	0.061

[1]	Xiangyang LIN, Qinghua XING, Fuxian LIU. Research on optimization of combat force for key air defense model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(3): 921-928.
[2]	Luyun QIU, Zhigeng FANG, Liangyan TAO, Qiucheng TAO. Effectiveness evaluation of network SoS based on improved FDNA model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(12): 3728-3737.
[3]	Chenrui SHI, Lu TIAN, Zhan XU, Ruxin ZHI, Jinhui CHEN. Effectiveness evaluation method of emergency communication and sensing equipment based on PSO-BP [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(11): 3455-3462.
[4]	Yuqi CHEN, Tingxue XU, Jianping HAO, Cheng LU, Zhiqiang LI. Task capability dependency analysis of weapon system of systems based on FDN [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(6): 1721-1728.
[5]	Xing PAN, Zhenyu ZHANG, Yanmei ZHANG, Ranran WANG. Equipment SoS support effectiveness evaluation based on Sobol sensitivity analysis [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(2): 390-398.
[6]	Ang GAO, Qisheng GUO, Zhiming DONG, Shaoqing YANG. Research on efficiency evaluation method of multi unmanned ground vehicle system based on EAS+MADRL [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(12): 3643-3651.
[7]	Weisheng YANG, Yu WANG, Yang YANG, Liang TANG. Combat network effectiveness evaluation under different node attack strategies based on operation loop [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(11): 3220-3228.
[8]	Chi HAN, Wei XIONG. Operational effectiveness evaluation of space reconnaissance equipment based on SVR optimized by improved grey wolf optimizer [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(10): 2902-2910.
[9]	Biao LI, Liwen WANG, Zhiwei XING, Qian LUO. Effectiveness evaluation of ground support process for transit flight [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(7): 1543-1549.
[10]	Minle WANG. Overview on combat operation planning of missile force [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(12): 2825-2832.
[11]	Zhigeng FANG, Ruirui SHAO, Zhao WANG, Sifeng LIU, Weiqing YOU, Su GAO. PS-GERT effectiveness evaluation model of GEO satellite communication constellation [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(10): 2356-2365.
[12]	WANG Shuangchuan, JIA Xisheng, HU Qiwei, WANG Qiang. Effectiveness evaluation for equipment maintenance support system based on normal grey cloud model [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(7): 1576-1582.
[13]	ZHANG Zhuang, LI Linlin, WEI Zhenhua, YU Hongfeng. Dynamic effectiveness evaluation of command and control system based on variable weight projection gray target [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(4): 801-809.
[14]	WANG Shuangchuan, HU Qiwei, LI Feng, WANG Qiang, RAN Qiaoran, MA Yunfei. Overview on effectiveness evaluation of equipment maintenance support [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(10): 2271-2278.
[15]	LUO Chengkun, CHEN Yunxiang, WANG Lili, WANG Zezhou, CHANG Zheng. Effectiveness evaluation method of system-of-systems based on operation loop and improved information entropy [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(1): 73-80.