卫星导航接收机三阶互调阻塞效应分析

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.04.32

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to master the interference rule of satellite navigation receiver under electromagnetic radiation, a navigation receiver is taken as the experimental object, the full level irradiation method is used to carry out the electromagnetic radiation test of the single frequency continuous wave and the third-order intermodulation blocking effect test of the out-of-band dual-band electromagnetic radiation, the accuracy of the blocking effect model of third-order intermodulation is verified by experiments. The results show that the tested navigation receiver operating frequency in the range of -4~18 MHz offset is more sensitive to single-frequency electromagnetic radiation. The ability to resist electromagnetic interference in negative frequency offset is much greater than that in positive frequency offset. The field intensity of the third-order intermodulation on the dual-band is significantly lower than the single frequency blocking interference field at the same frequency point, and the maximum difference is up to 46 dB. The ratio of the peak value of the third-order intermodulation blocking interference factor at the negative frequency deviation end to the peak value of the positive frequency deviation end is up to more than 20 times, and the sensitive frequency deviation range is more than twice the width of that of the positive frequency deviation end.

Key words: navigation receiver, single frequency continuous wave, electromagnetic radiation, blocking effect, third-order intermodulation

CLC Number:

TN97

Hongze ZHAO, Guanghui WEI, Xue DU, Jianyong ZHENG, Mei LI. Analysis of third-order intermodulation blocking effect for satellite navigation receiver[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(4): 1336-1342.

Figures/Tables 14

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Fig.4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

Fig.5

Table 9

References 31

1	蒋治宇, 郭承军. 卫星导航与5G技术应用的研究[C]//第九届中国卫星导航学术年会, 2018: 15-19.
	JIANG Z Y, GUO C J. Research on the application of satellite navigation and 5G technology[C]//Proc. of the 9th China Satellite Navigation Academic Annual Conference, 2018: 15-19.
2	ELLIOTT D , CHRISTOPHER J . Understanding GPS: principles and applications[M]. London: Artech House Incorporation, 2006: 194- 198.
3	范宇清, 程二威, 魏明, 等. 卫星导航接收机电磁环境效应研究综述[J]. 飞航导弹, 2019, 49 (12): 49- 54.
	FAN Y Q , CHENG E W , WEI M , et al. Summary of electromagnetic environmental effects of satellite navigation receivers[J]. Aerodynamic Missile Journal, 2019, 49 (12): 49- 54.
4	BEK M K , SHAHEEN E M , ELGAMEL S A . Classification and mathematical expression of different interference signals on a GPS receiver[J]. Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 2015, 62 (1): 23- 37. doi: 10.1002/navi.77
5	JANG J , PAONNI M , EISSFELLER B . CW interference effects on tracking performance of GNSS receivers[J]. IEEE Trans.on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2012, 48 (1): 243- 258. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2012.6129633
6	QU B , WEI J L , TANG Z P , et al. Analysis of combined effects of multipath and CW interference on coherent delay lock loop[J]. Wireless Personal Communications, 2014, 77 (3): 2213- 2233. doi: 10.1007/s11277-014-1634-1
7	YANG Y H , BA X H , CHEN J . A novel VLSI architecture for multi-constellation and multi-frequency GNSS acquisition engine[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 655- 665. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2885592
8	AGHADADASHFAM M , MOSAVI M R , REZAEI M J . A new post-correlation anti-jamming technique for GPS receivers[J]. GPS Solutions, 2020, 24 (4): 89- 105. doi: 10.1007/s10291-020-01004-y
9	JIANG Y L , ZHA H , SHI J R , et al. A compact x-band microwave pulse compressor using a corrugated cylindrical cavity[J]. IEEE Trans.on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2021, 69 (3): 1586- 1593. doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2021.3053913
10	SEIFI Z , GHORBANI A , ABDIPOUR A . Analysis and experi-mental study of radiative microwave pulses effects on the nonlinear performance of a low-noise amplifier[J]. IEEE Trans.on Plasma Science, 2021, 49 (3): 1105- 1114. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2021.3057613
11	ZHANG D X , ZHOU X , CHENG E W , et al. Investigation on effects of HPM pulse on UAV's datalink[J]. IEEE Trans.on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2020, 62 (3): 829- 839. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2019.2915285
12	ZHANG D X , CHENG E W , WAN H J , et al. Prediction of electromagnetic compatibility for dynamic datalink of UAV[J]. IEEE Trans.on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2019, 61 (5): 1474- 1482. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2018.2867641
13	LI W , WEI G H , PAN X D , et al. Electromagnetic compatibi-lity prediction method under the multifrequency in-band interference environment[J]. IEEE Trans.on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2018, 60 (2): 520- 528. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2017.2720961
14	HU D Z , WEI G H , PAN X D , et al. Investigation of the radia-tion immunity testing method in reverberation chambers[J]. IEEE Trans.on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2017, 59 (6): 1791- 1797. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2017.2698141
15	张庆龙, 程二威, 王玉明, 等. 无人机卫星导航系统的电磁干扰效应规律研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42 (12): 2684- 2691. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.12.03
	ZHANG Q L , CHENG E W , WANG Y M , et al. Research on the electromagnetic interference effect of UAV satellite navigation system[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42 (12): 2684- 2691. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.12.03
16	BAEK J , YOO S , KIM S . Jamming effect analysis of two Chinese GNSS Beidou-Ⅱ civil signals[J]. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2012, 2 (6): 840- 845.
17	MANSSON D, THOTTAPPILLIL R, NILSSON T. Susceptibility of civilian GPS receivers to electromagnetic radiation[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2008: 434-437.
18	BALAEI A T , DEMPSTER A G , PRESTI L L . Characterization of the effects of CW and pulse CW interference on the GPS signal quality[J]. IEEE Trans.on Aerospace & Electronic Systems, 2009, 45 (4): 1418- 1431.
19	BETZ J W , KOLODZIEJSKI K R . Generalized theory of code tracking with an early-late discriminator Part I: lower bound and coherent processing[J]. IEEE Trans.on Aerospace & Electronic Systems, 2009, 45 (4): 1538- 1556.
20	KARAIM M, ELGHAMRAWY H, TAMAZIN M, et al. Investigation of the effects of white Gaussian noise jamming on commercial GNSS receivers[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Computer Engineering & Systems, 2017: 468-472.
21	HEGARTY C J , BOBYN D , GRABOWSKI J , et al. An overview of the effects of out-of-band interference on GNSS recei-vers[J]. Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 2020, 67 (1): 143- 161. doi: 10.1002/navi.345
22	NOVAK A , SEDLACKOVA A N , STELMACH A , et al. Safety implications of GNSS signal interference at Zilina Air-port[J]. Operation and Economics in Transport, 2020, 22 (3): 40- 48.
23	BARRAK R , OTHMAN A , ABIB G I , et al. Design of a tunable anti-aliasing filter for multistandard RF subsampling GNSS receivers[J]. IEEE Trans.on Circuits and Systems Ⅱ: Express Briefs, 2019, 66 (2): 207- 211. doi: 10.1109/TCSII.2018.2848976
24	ARMSTRONG K. EMC for the functional safety of automobiles why EMC testing is insufficient, and what is necessary[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2008.
25	DUFFY A, ORLANDI A, NISANGHI H, et al. Signal integrity testing using multiple out-of-band sources in a reverberation chamber[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2008.
26	DUFFY A , ORLANDI A , ARMSTRONG K . Preliminary study of a reverberation chamber method for multiple-source testing using intermodulation[J]. IET Science, Measurement and Technology, 2010, 4 (1): 21- 27. doi: 10.1049/iet-smt.2009.0008
27	MARDIGUIAN M. Combined effects of several, simultaneous, EMI couplings[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2000: 181-184.
28	CHANG W T, KUEI J T, LAI S H. Electromagnetic intermodulation interference using quartz oscillators[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium, 2014.
29	GJB 8848—2016. 系统电磁环境效应试验方法[S]. 北京: 国家军用标准出版发行部, 2016.
	GJB 8848—2016. Electromagnetic environmental effects test methods for systems[S]. Beijing: Military Standard Press, 2016.
30	魏光辉, 潘晓东, 万浩江. 装备电磁辐射效应规律与作用机理[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2018.
	WEI G H , PAN X D , WAN H J . Feature and mechanism of electromagnetic radiation effects for equipment[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2018.
31	魏光辉, 杜雪, 王雅平. 用频设备带外多频电磁辐射三阶互调阻塞效应测试与建模评估方法[J]. 电子学报, 2021, 49 (6): 1094- 1100.
	WEI G H , DU X , WANG Y P . Testing and modeling evaluation method of third-order intermodulation blocking effect by outband multifrequency electromagnetic radiation for spectrum-dependent equipment[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2021, 49 (6): 1094- 1100.

E₀₀/E_f0/dB	分组 Δf_i/MHz	E_i/E_i0/dB
E₀₀/E_f0/dB	分组 Δf_i/MHz	1	2	3
-16.5	Δf₁=27	-0.5	-1.5	-0.5
-16.5	Δf₂=36	-1.5	-0.5	-1.0
0	Δf₁=27	-3.5	-1.5	-3.0
0	Δf₃=54	-15.5	-20.5	-17.0
-16.5	Δf₂=36	-1.0	-1.5	-0.5
-16.5	Δf₃=54	-13	-12	-14

序号	频偏Δf_i/MHz
序号	27	36	54
1	4.75	9	13.5
2	4.17	9.67	12.17
3	5.33	9.33	12.83
平均值	4.75	9.33	12.83

E₀₀/E_f0/dB	分组 Δf_i/MHz	E_i/E_i0/dB
E₀₀/E_f0/dB	分组 Δf_i/MHz	1	2	3
0	Δf₃=36	-1.0	-2.0	-3.0
0	Δf₄=72	-25.5	-23.5	-22.5
0	Δf₃=54	-1.5	-2.5	-3.5
0	Δf₄=108	-22.5	-20.5	-19.5
-6.5	Δf₃=27	-6.5	-3.0	-1.5
-6.5	Δf₄=18	-1.0	-2.0	-3.0
-8.5	Δf₃=27	-3.0	-4.5	-5.5
-8.5	Δf₄=45	-5.0	-1.0	-0.5
-10.5	Δf₃=27	-2.5	-1.5	-3.5
-10.5	Δf₄=51	-4.5	-5.5	-2.0
-9.0	Δf₃=36	-1.0	-2.0	-3.0
-9.0	Δf₄=60	-32.5	-31.5	-27.5
-9.0	Δf₃=36	-8.0	-10.0	-9.0
-9.0	Δf₄=66	-12.5	-10.5	-11.5
-10.0	Δf₃=45	-5.0	-7.0	-6.0
-10.0	Δf₄=81	-6.5	-4.5	-5.5
-9.0	Δf₃=54	-2.5	-3.5	-4.5
-9.0	Δf₄=93	-16.0	-14.0	-12.0
-11.0	Δf₃=36	-10.0	-11.0	-12.0
-11.0	Δf₄=57	-5.0	-4.0	-2.5
-10.0	Δf₃=36	-3.0	-6.0	-8.0
-10.0	Δf₄=69	-16.5	-11.5	-9.5

阻塞因子	频偏Δf_i/MHz
阻塞因子	18	45	51	57	60	66
平均值	1.72	3.10	3.16	8.10	17.46	10.00
最大值	1.80	3.35	3.35	8.26	19.59	11.67
最小值	1.65	2.82	2.99	7.36	15.56	8.75

阻塞因子	频偏Δf_i/MHz
阻塞因子	69	72	81	93	108
平均值	5.73	2.87	2.47	1.65	1.02
最大值	6.95	3.10	2.77	1.65	1.10
最小值	4.92	2.77	2.20	1.65	0.98

E₀₀/E_f0/dB	分组 Δf_i/MHz	E_i/E_i0/dB
E₀₀/E_f0/dB	分组 Δf_i/MHz	1	2	3
-28.0	Δf₁=-9	-9.0	-7.0	-8.0
-28.0	Δf₂=-12	-9.0	-16.0	-12.0
0	Δf₁=-9	-17.0	-15.0	-13.0
0	Δf₃=-18	-18.0	-24.0	-30.0
-28.0	Δf₂=-12	-11.0	-7.0	-9.0
-28.0	Δf₃=-18	-22.0	-26.0	-24.0

Analysis of third-order intermodulation blocking effect for satellite navigation receiver

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 14

References 31

Related Articles 7

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Mei LI, Guanghui WEI, Hongze ZHAO, Jianyong ZHENG, Xue DU. Analysis of blocking effects of electromagnetic radiation noise on navigation receiver [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(10): 3221-3227.
[2]	Kai ZHAO, Guanghui WEI, Xiaodong PAN, Xue DU, Shizhao REN. Interference laws of single frequency electromagnetic radiation to radar [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(2): 363-368.
[3]	Jiangning SUN, Xiaodong PAN, Xinfu LU, Haojiang WAN. Test method of bulk current injection into the equivalent high field electromagnetic radiation of two-wire system with two probes [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(11): 3064-3071.
[4]	Xue DU, Guanghui WEI, Shizhao REN, Kai ZHAO. Analysis of blocking effect for single frequency continuous wave electromagnetic radiation in swept frequency radar [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(12): 2742-2746.
[5]	LI Wei, WEI Guang-hui, PAN Xiao-dong, LU Xin-fu, WAN Hao-jiang, LI Hui. Electromagnetic radiation effects forecasting method about in-band dual-frequency continuous wave for typical communication equipment [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38(11): 2474-2480.
[6]	HU Yan-feng, CAO Ke-jin, BIAN Shao-feng, LI Bao, YE Xin. GNSS spoofing detection algorithm based on clock frequency drift monitoring [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37(7): 1629-1632.
[7]	WU Wei, NI Shao-jie, WANG Fei-xue. Scheduling DSP peripheral devices in real-time based on FIFO circular buffering [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 31(5): 1209-1212.

序号	频偏Δf_i/MHz
序号	-9	-12	-18
1	5.62	17.78	12.59
2	7.08	15.85	10.00
3	6.55	14.67	14.67
平均值	6.39	16.05	12.27

E₀₀/E_f0/dB	分组 Δf_i/MHz	E_i/E_i0/dB
E₀₀/E_f0/dB	分组 Δf_i/MHz	1	2	3
0	Δf₃=-12	-20.0	-14.0	-22.0
0	Δf₄=-24	-39.0	-49.0	-33.0
0	Δf₃=-18	-17.0	-20.0	-15.0
0	Δf₄=-36	-50.0	-45.0	-55.0
0	Δf₃=-24	-29.0	-33.0	-35.0
0	Δf₄=-48	-44.0	-36.0	-33.0
0	Δf₃=-36	-45.0	-49.0	-41.0
0	Δf₄=-72	-35.0	-27.0	-41.0
0	Δf₃=-48	-40.0	-44.0	-48.0
0	Δf₄=-96	-39.0	-32.0	-25.0
-30	Δf₃=-18	-8.0	-9.0	-11.0
-30	Δf₄=-30	-41.0	-40.0	-38.0
0	Δf₃=-30	-47.0	-50.0	-44.0
0	Δf₄=-60	-46.0	-42.0	-53.0
-10	Δf₃=-36	-40.0	-44.0	-38.0
-10	Δf₄=-84	-34.0	-26.0	-36.0
-30	Δf₃=-30	-37.0	-40.0	-34.0
-30	Δf₄=-54	-37.0	-31.0	-42.0
-28	Δf₃=-54	-25.0	-23.0	-27.0
-28	Δf₄=-102	-25.0	-33.0	-23.0

阻塞因子	频偏Δf_i/MHz
阻塞因子	-24	-30	-36	-48	-54
平均值	29.68	173.18	113.63	148.42	360.16
最大值	34.59	209.89	118.03	160.32	374.11
最小值	27.48	148.59	105.20	142.89	333.43

阻塞因子	频偏Δf_i/MHz
阻塞因子	-60	-72	-84	-96	-102
平均值	374.11	127.50	113.63	45.39	1.37
最大值	419.76	137.72	122.74	50.93	1.73
最小值	333.43	109.40	97.50	40.46	1.09

E₀₀/E_f0/dB	分组 Δf_i/MHz	E_i/E_i0/dB
E₀₀/E_f0/dB	分组 Δf_i/MHz	1	2	3
-16.5	Δf₂=36	-1.0	-0.5	-1.5
	Δf₁=27	-1.0	-1.5	-0.5
	R	0.93	0.87	0.98
-9.0	Δf₂=60	-28.5	-23.5	-26.5
	Δf₁=36	-3.0	-6.0	-4.0
	R	1.00	0.89	1.00
-7.0	Δf₂=66	-15.0	-10.0	-8.0
	Δf₁=36	-7.0	-10.0	-12.0
	R	1.34	1.19	0.95
-27.0	Δf₂=-30	-37.0	-38.0	-39.0
	Δf₁=-18	-13.0	-12.0	-11.0
	R	1.12	1.25	1.40
0	Δf₂=-60	-56.0	-49.0	-44.0
	Δf₁=-30	-42.0	-45.0	-48.0
	R	1.17	1.31	1.17
0	Δf₂=-72	-40.0	-36.0	-30.0
	Δf₁=-36	-39.0	-42.0	-45.0
	R	1.28	1.28	1.28