结冰条件下飞机全包线模态特性分析方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.10.24

Abstract

Abstract:

Aiming at the problem of flight quality evaluation within the full envelope under icing conditions, a method for fast calculation of typical mode parameters in the whole envelope is proposed by combining adaptive initial value calculation with time-domain equivalent system fitting. A typical man-machine-loop system model is established. Numerical simulation is used to obtain the response data of the aircraft for rudder doublet manipulation. Based on the analysis of the characteristics of the time-domain response data, a method of adaptive initial value calculation of the lateral and directional equivalent system fitting is proposed to solve the sensitivity problem of the initial value. The time-domain equivalent system fitting method is used to obtain the lateral and directional modal parameter characteristics of a certain aircraft clean configuration and different degrees of icing severity in the entire envelope, and the effect of icing on the flight quality of the aircraft is quantified from an overall perspective. The simulation results show that the proposed method has good adaptability in the full envelope, which provides a new idea for the rapid analysis of the longitudinal and transverse typical modal characteristics of aircraft, and has a good engineering application prospect.

Key words: quality evaluation, equivalent system fitting, initial value of fitting, adaptive initial value calculation, numerical simulation

CLC Number:

V212

Qiang WU, Haojun XU, Binbin PEI, Hequan ZHU, Xin WU. Analysis method of aircraft modal characteristics within the full envelope under icing conditions[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(10): 2893-2901.

Figures/Tables 16

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Table 4

Fig.8

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

References 21

1	BOEING. Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents[R]. America: Boeing Commercial Airplanes, 2015: 24.
2	BROWN K . Aircraft icing[J]. Mobility Forum: the Journal of the Air Mobility Command's Magazine, 1999, 25 (4): 24- 28.
3	KOPP W . Danger of ice formation on airplanes[J]. Technical Report Archive & Image Library, 1929, 18 (2): 12- 15.
4	PRESTON G. Effects of ice formation on airplane performance in level cruising flight[R]. Washington: NASA, 1948: NACA-TN-1598.
5	RATVASKY T P, VAN Z J, RILEY J T. NASA/FAA tailplane icing program overview[C]//Proc. of the 37th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 1999.
6	RATVASKY T. NASA/FAA tailplane icing program: flight test report[R]. Washington: NASA, 2000: NASA/TP-2000-209908.
7	REEHORST A, POTAPCZUK M, RATVASKY T, et al. Wind tunnel measured effects on a twin-engine short-haul transport caused by simulated ice accretions: data report[R]. New York: AIAA, 1996: 96-0871.
8	王良禹, 徐浩军, 张喆, 等. 结冰对飞机横航向飞行品质的影响[J]. 飞行力学, 2018, 36 (1): 16- 19.
	WANG L Y , XU H J , ZHANG Z , et al. The effect of icing on the aircraft's horizontal flight quality[J]. Flight Mechanics, 2018, 36 (1): 16- 19.
9	胡兆丰. 人机系统和飞行品质[M]. 北京: 北京航空航天大学出版社, 1993.
	HU Z F . Human-machine system and flight quality[M]. Beijing: Beihang University Press, 1993.
10	HODGKINSON J. A history of low order equivalent systems for aircraft handling qualities analysis and design[C]//Proc. of the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit, 2003.
11	侯世芳, 徐坚, 杨博文. 基于地面试验数据的飞机横航向飞行品质评估[J]. 飞行力学, 2015, 33 (3): 201- 204.
	HOU S F , XU J , YANG B W . Lateral and directional flight quality assessment based on ground flight test results[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2015, 33 (3): 201- 204.
12	KAMALI C , HEBBAR A , VIJEESH T , et al. Real-time desktop flying qualities evaluation simulator[J]. Defence Science Journal, 2014, 64 (1): 27- 32. doi: 10.14429/dsj.64.4961
13	傅庆庆. 固定翼飞机横航向飞行品质评价方法研究[D]. 广汉: 中国民用航空飞行学院, 2019.
	FU Q Q. Study on evaluation method of flight quality of fixed-wing aircraft in lateral direction[D]. Guanghan: Civil Aviation Flight University of China, 2019.
14	PAMADI B N . Performance, stability, dynamics and control of airplanes[M]. New York: AIAA Educational Series, 2003.
15	薛定宇, 陈阳泉. 基于Matlab/Simulink的系统仿真技术与应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2001.
	XUE D Y , CHEN Y Q . System simulation technology and application based on Matlab/Simulink[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2001.
16	BRAGG M B, HUTCHISON T, MERRET J, et al. Effect of ice accretion on aircraft flight dynamics[C]//Proc. of the 38th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, 2000, AIAA 2000-0360.
17	MELODY J W , ILILLBRAND T , BASAR T , et al. H∞ parameter identification for inflight detection of aircraft icing: the time-varying case[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2001, 9 (12): 1327- 1335. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0661(01)00081-8
18	POKHARIYAL D, BRAGG M, HUTCHISON T, et al. Aircraft flight dynamics with simulated ice accretion[C]//Proc. of the 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2001: AIAA-2001-0541.
19	LAMPTON A , VALASEK J . Prediction of icing effects on the dynamic response of light airplanes[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2007, 30 (3): 722- 732. doi: 10.2514/1.25687
20	LAMPTON A , VALASEK J . Prediction of icing effects on the lateral directional stability and control[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2012, 23 (1): 305- 311. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2011.08.005
21	裴彬彬, 徐浩军, 薛源, 等. 飞机结冰后非线性气动力建模及动态响应特性研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2016, 34 (3): 317- 321. doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2015.0215
	PEI B B , XU H J , XU Y , et al. Research on nonlinear aerodynamics modeling anddynamic response in icing conditions[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2016, 34 (3): 317- 321. doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2015.0215

序号	T_R	T_S	ω_d	ζ_d
1	1.4	-20	1.5	0.01
2	1.4	-10	1.5	0.01
3	1.4	-5	1.5	0.01
4	1.4	-20	1.5	0.06
5	1.4	-10	1.5	0.06
6	1.4	-5	1.5	0.06
7	1.4	-20	1.5	0.1
8	1.4	-10	1.5	0.1
9	1.4	-5	1.5	0.1
10	0.5	-20	1.5	0.1
11	1.0	-20	1.5	0.1
12	2.0	-20	1.5	0.1
13	3.0	-20	1.5	0.1
14	4.0	-20	1.5	0.1
15	5.0	-20	1.5	0.1

序号	J	T_S	ω_d	ζ_d
1	1.194 2e-05	-20.001 5	1.500 0	0.010 0
2	6.641 4e-05	-10.003 0	1.500 0	0.010 0
3	6.232 0e-05	-5.000 0	1.500 0	0.010 0
4	5.572 9e-05	-20.071 3	1.500 1	0.059 9
5	5.860 6e-05	-10.002 8	1.500 1	0.059 9
6	5.501 3e-05	-5.000 0	1.500 1	0.060 0
7	4.832 4e-05	-20.066 2	1.500 1	0.099 8
8	8.894 5e-05	-10.008 5	1.499 7	0.100 6
9	4.774 7e-05	-5.000 0	1.500 1	0.099 8
10	4.809 7e-15	-20.000 0	1.500 0	0.100 0
11	2.960 7e-07	-20.005 9	1.500 1	0.099 8
12	3.033 9e-04	-20.164 4	1.499 6	0.100 4
13	5.720 8e-04	-20.325 3	1.498 8	0.100 4
14	0.005 2	-21.003 1	1.496 8	0.101 8
15	0.017 0	-21.894 1	1.494 7	0.103 1

T	J	T_S	ω_d	ζ_d
设定值	-	-20	1.5	0.01
1.0	4.832 4e-05	-20.066 2	1.500 1	0.099 8
2.0	1.011 4e-04	-20.025 9	1.499 9	0.100 0
3.0	6.061 3e-05	-20.012 6	1.500 1	0.100 0
4.0	4.522 7e-04	-20.019 8	1.500 0	0.100 1
5.0	0.857 0	-20.395 4	1.497 4	0.102 2

参数	一级品质	二级品质	三级品质
ζ_d	大于0.08	大于0.02	小于0.02

速度/m·s^-1	ζ_d	J
138	0.124 3	7.557e-05
144	0.122 6	5.619e-05
150	0.120 6	8.132e-06
156	0.119 6	0.000 13
162	0.117 9	0.000 11
168	0.116 8	0.000 31
174	0.116 2	4.151e-05
180	0.115 3	3.253e-05
186	0.114 7	8.99e-05
192	0.114 4	0.002 08
198	0.113 8	7.183e-05
204	0.113 2	0.000 22
210	0.112 9	0.000 24
216	0.112 8	0.000 16
222	0.113 0	0.001 29

Analysis method of aircraft modal characteristics within the full envelope under icing conditions

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 16

References 21

Related Articles 5

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

速度/m·s^-1	ζ_d	J
138	0.092 3	8.539e-05
144	0.093 1	7.186e-06
150	0.092 6	3.089e-05
156	0.091 4	3.423e-05
162	0.090 5	6.438e-05
168	0.089 6	3.914e-05
174	0.088 8	0.000 11
180	0.088 3	0.000 26
186	0.087 8	8.575e-05
192	0.087 5	0.000 54
198	0.087 0	0.000 19
204	0.086 7	0.000 25
210	0.086 5	0.001 43
216	0.086 4	0.000 43
222	0.086 3	0.002 75

速度/m·s^-1	ζ_d	J
138	0.083 5	0.000 46
144	0.084 5	0.000 11
150	0.085 2	4.819e-05
156	0.085 2	4.319e-05
162	0.084 4	2.167e-05
168	0.083 3	4.090e-05
174	0.082 5	8.296e-05
180	0.081 9	6.032e-05
186	0.081 4	0.000 11
192	0.081 0	0.000 11
198	0.080 5	0.000 15
204	0.080 3	0.000 33

速度/m·s^-1	ζ_d	J
138	0.069 6	0.004 16
144	0.072 5	3.425e-06
150	0.074 0	0.000 89
156	0.075 7	0.000 97
162	0.076 3	2.916e-05
168	0.075 3	3.152e-05
174	0.073 7	0.000 40
180	0.074 0	7.027e-05
186	0.073 4	6.245e-05

[1]	Fengtao WEI, Yangyang ZHANG, Junyu LI, Yunpeng SHI. Improved sine cosine algorithm based on dynamic classification strategy [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(6): 1596-1605.
[2]	JIN Shan, JIN Zhigang. Multiobjective evaluation method of coverage quality based onhybrid algorithm of fuzzy wavelet and clustering [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(6): 1316-1323.
[3]	JU Yan-wei, ZHANG Yan. Research on ISAR image quality evaluation [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37(2): 297-303.
[4]	WANG Xiaowen, ZHAO Zonggui, TANG Lei. Novel quality metric for infrared and visible image fusion [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34(5): 871-875.
[5]	YANG Zhuo, XUE Zheng-hui, LI Wei-ming, LV Xin. Analysis and design of composite element frequency selective surfaces with multiple dielectric layers [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(1): 35-38.