基于灰色关联-模糊综合评判的雷达抗干扰性能评估方法

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.06.13

Abstract

Abstract:

In view of the problem of radar anti-jamming performance evaluation, a method of radar anti-jamming performance evaluation based on grey correlation fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is proposed. Based on the theory of fuzzy mathematics and correlation function, the set of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation factors of the evaluation index for reference is used firstly. Through scoring by the interval number, the weight of the evaluation index is determined based on the grey correlation method. Then, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation results are calculated by establishing the evaluation matrix by the membership function, and the anti-jamming capability level of radar is determined according to the membership degree. Finally, the fuzzy value linear order evaluation model is established to determine the order of radar anti-jamming performance. The example shows that the proposed method can not only determine the evaluation level of radar anti-jamming performance, but also further determine the order of radar anti-jamming performance, which is more objective and reliable.

Key words: radar anti-jamming, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, grey correlation, linear order method

CLC Number:

TN973

Juntao ZHANG, Shangsheng LI, Xukun WANG. Method of radar anti-jamming performance evaluation based on grey correlation-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(6): 1557-1563.

Figures/Tables 6

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

References 30

1	郭新民, 王旭, 魏国华. 岸基警戒雷达抗干扰性能评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40 (4): 768- 775.
	GUO X M , WANG X , WEI G H . Evaluation method of anti-jamming performance of shore-based warning radar[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40 (4): 768- 775.
2	周颖, 王雪松, 徐振海, 等. 雷达电子战效果及效能评估的一般性思考[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2004, 26 (5): 617- 620. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2004.05.020
	ZHOU Y , WANG X S , XU Z H , et al. A general consideration of radar electronic warfare effect and effectiveness evaluation[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2004, 26 (5): 617- 620. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2004.05.020
3	BAI S, HONG J, NIU Z Y. Research on evaluation method of radar anti-jamming effectiveness based on experimental big data[C]//Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Big Data and Information Analytics, 2020: 392-395.
4	NOVILLO F, ROMERO-ARGUELLO J, GUERRERO E, et al. Performance evaluation of radar systems in noise jamming environments[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting, 2016.
5	MINNA V, JUHA J, HENA P. Performance evaluation of radar NCTR using the target aspect and signature[C]//Proc. of the IEEE Radar Conference, 2014: 623-628.
6	刘晓东. 雷达抗干扰效能评估指标体系及方法研究[D]. 成都: 电子科技大学, 2008.
	LIU X D. Research on evaluation index system and method of radar anti-jamming efficiency[D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2008.
7	CAO F , WU F , LI J . Radar ECCM performance assessment model[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 344, 121- 124. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.344.121
8	孟晋丽, 傅有光, 陈翼, 等. 雷达抗干扰效能指标体系与评估方法[J]. 现代雷达, 2014, 36 (11): 80- 84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7859.2014.11.018
	MENG J L , FU Y G , CHEN Y , et al. Index system and evaluation method of radar anti-jamming efficiency[J]. Modern Radar, 2014, 36 (11): 80- 84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7859.2014.11.018
9	周万幸. 雷达抗干扰效能评估模型与指标体系研究[J]. 现代雷达, 2013, 35 (11): 1- 5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7859.2013.11.001
	ZHOU W X . Research on evaluation model and index system of radar anti-jamming efficiency[J]. Modern Radar, 2013, 35 (11): 1- 5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7859.2013.11.001
10	肖振民, 代培龙, 沈伟, 等. 基于AHP的分布式雷达抗干扰效能评估方法[J]. 现代雷达, 2017, 39 (1): 77- 83.
	XIAO Z M , DAI P L , SHEN W , et al. Distributed radar anti-jamming effectiveness evaluation method based on AHP[J]. Modern Radar, 2017, 39 (1): 77- 83.
11	赵智剑, 余科, 马跃华, 等. 基于AHP-云模型的雷达抗干扰性能评估[J]. 空天防御, 2020, 3 (1): 65- 72.
	ZHAO Z J , YU K , MA Y H , et al. Evaluation of radar anti-jamming performance based on AHP-cloud model[J]. Aerospace Defense, 2020, 3 (1): 65- 72.
12	徐斐, 谢洲烨, 沈伟, 等. 基于神经网络的分布式雷达抗干扰效能评估方法[J]. 现代雷达, 2015, 37 (7): 4- 7, 11.
	XU F , XIE Z Y , SHEN W , et al. Distributed radar anti-jamming effectiveness evaluation method based on neural network[J]. Mo-dern radar, 2015, 37 (7): 4- 7, 11.
13	陈小龙, 陈宝欣, 黄勇, 等. 频控阵雷达空距频聚焦信号处理方法[J]. 雷达学报, 2018, 7 (2): 183- 193.
	CHEN X L , CHEN B X , HUANG Y , et al. Frequency diverse array radar signal processing via space-range-doppler focus (SRDF) method[J]. Journal of Radars, 2018, 7 (2): 183- 193.
14	张建军, 曲宏宇, 赵栋华. 基于神经网络的雷达抗干扰效能评估方法[J]. 海军航空工程学院学报, 2015, 30 (1): 28- 32.
	ZHANG J J , QU H Y , ZHAO D H . Evaluation method of radar anti-jamming effectiveness based on neural network[J]. Journal of Naval Aeronautical Engineering Academy, 2015, 30 (1): 28- 32.
15	孔亚盟, 冯德军, 杨勇, 等. 基于物元模型的被动雷达导引头抗干扰性能评估[J]. 中国电子科学研究院学报, 2014, 9 (1): 64- 69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5692.2014.01.012
	KONG Y M , FENG D J , YANG Y , et al. Evaluation of anti-jamming performance of passive radar seeker based on matter-element model[J]. Journal of Chinese Academy of Electronic Sciences, 2014, 9 (1): 64- 69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5692.2014.01.012
16	孔亚盟. 雷达导引头面临的复杂战场环境及其适应能力的综合评估研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2014.
	KONG Y M. Study on comprehensive evaluation of radar seeker in complex battlefield environment and its adaptability[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2014.
17	ZADEH L A . A note on prototype theory and fuzzy sets[J]. Cognition, 1982, 12 (3): 291- 297. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(82)90036-1
18	QI Z F , HAN S , LI J X . Applications of generalized rough set theory in evaluation index system of radar anti-jamming performance[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University(Science), 2016, 21 (2): 151- 158. doi: 10.1007/s12204-016-1706-3
19	李月琴, 闫晓鹏, 杭和平, 等. 基于模糊综合评判的无线电引信抗干扰性能评估[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37 (5): 791- 797. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.05.004
	LI Y Q , YAN X P , HANG H P , et al. Evaluation of anti-jamming performance of radio fuze based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37 (5): 791- 797. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2016.05.004
20	张仲敏, 李俊山, 宋凭, 等. 一种基于模糊层次分析的多Agent电子对抗装备状态智能评判方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35 (4): 516- 522. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.04.013
	ZHANG Z M , LI J S , SONG P , et al. An intelligent evaluation method of multi-agent electronic countermeasures equipment state based on fuzzy hierarchical analysis[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35 (4): 516- 522. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.04.013
21	耿涛, 卢广山, 张安. 基于Vague集的空中目标威胁评估群决策方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2011, 33 (12): 2686- 2690. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2011.12.21
	GENG T , LU G S , ZHANG A . Group decision making method for air target threat assessment based on vague set[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 33 (12): 2686- 2690. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2011.12.21
22	要瑞璞, 沈惠璋. Vague集多指标决策的模糊值线性序法[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2009, 45 (28): 39- 40, 95. doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2009.28.011
	YAO R P , SHEN H Z . Fuzzy value linear order method for multi-index decision making based on Vague set[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2009, 45 (28): 39- 40, 95. doi: 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2009.28.011
23	YA N L , ZHUANG Z H . Index and evaluation of radar anti-jamming ability based on improved grey correlation[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 926-930, 3629- 3632. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.926-930.3629
24	BU F K, HE J, LI H R, et al. Radar seeker anti-jamming performance prediction and evaluation method based on the improved grey wolf optimizer algorithm and support vector machine[C]//Proc. of the IEEE 3rd International Conference on Electronics Technology, 2020: 704-710.
25	何俊, 李淑华, 周之平, 等. 基于博弈论和灰色关联分析的雷达抗干扰评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2014, 39 (12): 119- 122.
	HE J , LI S H , ZHOU Z P , et al. Evaluation of radar anti-jamming ability based on game theory and grey relation analysis[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2014, 39 (12): 119- 122.
26	杜栋. 现代综合评价方法与案例精选[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2015: 245- 250.
	DU D . Modern comprehensive evaluation method and case selection[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2015: 245- 250.
27	郭亚军. 综合评价理论方法及应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008: 25- 36.
	GUO Y J . Theory and method of comprehensive evaluation and its application[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2008: 25- 36.
28	臧翰林, 李艳玲. 基于群层次分析法的雷达导引头抗干扰性能评估[J]. 探测与控制学报, 2018, 40 (6): 110- 114, 120.
	ZANG H L , LI Y L . Evaluation of anti-jamming performance of radar seeker based on group AHP[J]. Journal of Detection and Control, 2008, 40 (6): 110- 114, 120.
29	宋宝军, 张秦, 姜军. 基于Vague集模糊值线性序法的雷达抗干扰效能评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2016, 41 (2): 124- 127. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2016.02.031
	SONG B J , ZHANG Q , JIANG J . Evaluation of radar anti-jamming effectiveness based on Vague set fuzzy linear sequence method[J]. Fire Gontrol & Command Control, 2016, 41 (2): 124- 127. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2016.02.031
30	刘俊娟, 王炜, 程琳. 基于梯形隶属函数的区间数模糊评价方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2009, 31 (2): 390- 392. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2009.02.032
	LIU J J , WANG W , CHENG L . Interval number fuzzy evaluation method based on trapezoidal membership function[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 31 (2): 390- 392. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2009.02.032

评估指标	等级
评估指标	1	2	3	4	5
抗干扰效果	差	较差	一般	较好	好
数值特征	0~0.2	0.2~0.4	0.4~0.6	0.6~0.8	0.8~1.0

序号	信号功率	工作频段	抗干扰措施	电磁环境	对抗时机
雷达X₁	0.85	1.00	0.82	0.80	0.65
雷达X₂	0.79	0.80	0.71	0.85	0.78
雷达X₃	0.56	0.83	0.29	0.84	0.79

序号	信号功率	工作频段	抗干扰措施	电磁环境	对抗时机
1	雷达X₁	雷达X₁	雷达X₁	雷达X₂	雷达X₃
2	雷达X₂	雷达X₃	雷达X₂	雷达X₃	雷达X₂
3	雷达X₃	雷达X₂	雷达X₃	雷达X₁	雷达X₁

数据来源	信号功率	工作频段	抗干扰措施	电磁环境	对抗时机
本文	0.18	0.23	0.27	0.18	0.15
文献[29]	0.20	0.15	0.45	0.10	0.10

[1]	Dubo HE, Dong HUANG, Wencheng SHI. Evaluation of supplier quality performance based on group DEMATEL and grey correlation projection [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(4): 980-990.
[2]	HU Liping, LIU Jinfan, WANG Hongye, YAN Hua, YIN Hongcheng. Vehicle SAR simulation images validation method based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(3): 534-540.
[3]	ZHAO Lin, ZHOU Junfeng, LIU Yuan, HAO Yong. Three body differential game approach of pursuit evasion defense in three dimensional space [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(2): 322-335.
[4]	MA Zhanxin, SI Qin. Optimization method and improving strategy based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(9): 2016-2025.
[5]	YANG Qingqing, FAN Guihua. Battle damage assessment of buildings based on improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(9): 2026-2031.
[6]	WANG Yongpan, YANG Jiangping, DENG Xiang, HOU Xiaodong. Assessment model of complex equipment maintenance quality based on Bayesian network [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39(3): 569-576.
[7]	WANG Wei, YU Jiaxiang, YANG Shaoqing, WANG Lei. #br# Operation resolution scheme risk assessment for informationizedwarship formation at sea [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38(3): 569-574.
[8]	LI Ying-chun, WANG Guo-hong, SUN Dian-xing, GUAN Cheng-bin. Technique against self-protection repeating track#br# false-target deceptive jamming for radar [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37(6): 1242-1248.
[9]	XU Dan, CHEN Zhi-jun, WANG Qian-cheng, CHEN Yun-xia, KANG Rui. Method for consistency check of degradation model based on spatial similarity and fluctuation threshold [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37(2): 455-459.
[10]	GONG Shu-feng，BEN De，PAN Ming-hai. Discrete frequency code waveform design for OAR based on HGSAA [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 35(9): 1854-1860.
[11]	WU Wen, MENG Xiang-ru, MA Zhi-qiang, LIANG Xiao. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of network survivability based on combinational weight [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2013, 35(4): 786-790.
[12]	MIAO Qi-guang, LIU Juan, NING Shu-ting. Battle damage assessment of airport based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 34(7): 1395-1399.
[13]	CHEN Jun-sheng, ZHOU Wen-ming. Hybrid evaluating method for support capability of armament distribution [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 33(11): 2453-2457.
[14]	LIU Pei-de, GUAN Zhong-liang. Research on multiple attribute decision-making under risk with continuous random variable and weight unknown [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 31(9): 2133-2136,2150.
[15]	LIU Kai-di, PANG Yan-jun, SUI Hui-qiang. New method of reliability evaluation on inertial navigation system simulation [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 31(6): 1492-1495.

Method of radar anti-jamming performance evaluation based on grey correlation-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 30

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments