基于概率推理的舷外有源诱饵干扰评估方法研究

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2024.02.24

Abstract

Abstract:

In addressing the non-cooperative character of electronic countermeasures and the subjective character of traditional jamming effectiveness evaluation method for outboard active decoy, an jamming effectiveness evaluation method based on probabilistic reasoning is proposed. Firstly, the jamming effectiveness criterion is derived from the dynamic process of missile terminal guidance and the role of non-cooperative parameters is analyzed at the signal level and the posture level. Then, based on the principle of probabilistic reasoning, the jamming effectiveness reasoning model is established and the contents of jamming effectiveness evaluation are described. Finally, the forward and reverse reasoning result are analysed through numerical simulation and different decoy jamming scenarios are evaluated. The simulation results show that the probability distribution of the jamming effectiveness criterion can be obtained from the unknown parameters using probabilistic reasoning, which provides a quantitative and scalable jamming evaluation framework for outboard active decoys.

Key words: electronic countermeasures, outboard active decoy, probabilistic reasoning, jamming effectiveness

CLC Number:

TN97

Zhaodong WU, Shengliang HU, Yasong LUO, Zhong LIU, Jiawei XIA. Research on outboard active decoy jamming evaluation method based on probabilistic reasoning[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(2): 605-615.

Figures/Tables 18

Fig.1

Table 1

Fig.2

Table 2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Table 3

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

Fig.15

References 31

1	ZHANG C D. The construction and characteristics of foreign army's electronic countermeasure equipment[C]//Proc. of the Social and Humanities Science Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, 2021, 96: 01012.
2	KIM K . Engagement-scenario-based decoy-effect simulation against an anti-ship missile considering radar cross section and evasive maneuvers of naval ships[J]. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 2021, 35 (3): 238- 246. doi: 10.26748/KSOE.2021.023
3	LI S P , GUO J G . An angle error extraction algorithm based on JADE for three-channel radar seeker system with the existence of deception jamming[J]. Digital Signal Processing, 2022, 131, 103754. doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2022.103754
4	KANTER I . Varieties of average monopulse responses to multiple targets[J]. IEEE Trans.on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1981, 17 (1): 25- 28.
5	JIANG W , REN Y H , LIU Y , et al. Artificial neural networks and deep learning techniques applied to radar target detection: a review[J]. Electronics, 2022, 11 (1): 156. doi: 10.3390/electronics11010156
6	GENG Z , YAN H , ZHANG J D , et al. Deep-learning for radar: a survey[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9, 141800- 141818. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3119561
7	LAKSHMI E V, SASTRY N N, RAO B P. Optimum active decoy deployment for effective deception of missile radars[C]//Proc. of the IEEE CIE International Conference on Radar, 2011: 234-237.
8	LUO Y S , FENG C X , XIA Q T , et al. Study on the jamming position maneuver algorithm of off-board active electronic countermeasure unmanned surface vehicles[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9, 61184- 61192. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3063856
9	RIM J W, KOH I S, CHOI S H. Jamming performance analysis for repeater-type active decoy against ground tracking radar considering dynamics of platform and decoy[C]//Proc. of the 18th International Radar Symposium, 2017.
10	RIM J W, KOH I S. Effect of beam pattern and amplifier gain of repeater-type active decoy on jamming to active RF seeker system based on proportional navigation law[C]//Proc. of the 19th International Radar Symposium, 2018.
11	RIM J W , KOH I S . Survivability simulation of airborne platform with expendable active decoy countering RF missile[J]. IEEE Trans.on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2019, 56 (1): 196- 207.
12	许政, 王强, 于勇, 等. 舷外有源诱饵干扰作战使用研究[J]. 现代电子技术, 2010, 33 (21): 61- 64.
	XU Z , WANG Q , YU Y , et al. Operational application method of outboard active decoy interference[J]. Modern Electronics Technique, 2010, 33 (21): 61- 64.
13	LIU X H , YANG J , LU J , et al. Application of AHP and D-S evidential theory in radar seeker anti-interference performance evaluation[J]. The Journal of Engineering, 2019, (21): 7977- 7980.
14	ZHU Y J , LYU W L , WANG J F . Performance evaluation of radar against complicated EM environment based on AHP[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 2026 (1): 012017. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2026/1/012017
15	戚宗锋, 韩山, 李建勋. 基于粗糙集的雷达抗干扰性能评估指标体系研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2016, 28 (2): 335- 342.
	QI Z F , HAN S , LI J X . Research on radar anti-jamming performance evaluation index system based on rough set theory[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2016, 28 (2): 335- 342.
16	QI Z F , HAN S , LI J X . Applications of generalized rough set theory in evaluation index system of radar anti-jamming performance[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 2016, 21 (2): 151- 158. doi: 10.1007/s12204-016-1706-3
17	ZHU W L, LIU S L, XIE H X, et al. An online evaluation method based on entropy-topsis radar interference effect[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Applications, 2020: 606-609.
18	ZHU W L, ZANG Z Q, LI P J, et al. A method of radar threat identification based on entropy-topsis[C]//Proc. of the IEEE 2nd International Conference on Electronic Information and Communication Technology, 2019: 896-899.
19	CHU Z Y , XIAO N , LIANG J . Jamming effect evaluation method based on radar behavior recognition[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, 2020, 1629 (1): 012001. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1629/1/012001
20	翁鑫锦. 基于机器学习的雷达干扰效能评估[D]. 成都: 电子科技大学, 2019.
	WEN X J. Effectiveness evaluation of radar jamming based on machine learning[D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2019.
21	ZHANG H Y , YU L , CHEN Y S , et al. Fast complex-valued CNN for radar jamming signal recognition[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13 (15): 2867.
22	CHU Z Y , XIAO N , LIANG J . Jamming effect evaluation method based on radar behavior recognition[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, 2020, 1629 (1): 012001.
23	QIN F T, MENG J, DU J, et al. Radar jamming effect evaluation based on AdaBoost combined classification model[C]//Proc. of the IEEE 4th International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science, 2013: 910-913.
24	SHERMAN S M , BARTON D K . Monopulse principles and techniques[M]. Artech House, 2011.
25	杨青, 余国文, 沈薇薇. 振幅和差式雷达导引头天线设计与仿真[J]. 空军雷达学院学报, 2011, 25 (5): 325-326, 331.
	YANG Q , YU G W , SHEN W W . Design and simulation of seeker antenna of radar with sum and difference by amplitude[J]. Journal of Air Force Radar Academy, 2011, 25 (5): 325-326, 331.
26	NARYKOV A S, KRASNOV O A, YAROVOY A. Algorithm for resource management of multiple phased array radars for target tracking[C]//Proc. of the 16th International Conference on Information Fusion, 2013: 1258-1264.
27	ZHANG Y , JIU B , WANG P H , et al. An end-to-end anti-jamming target detection method based on CNN[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2021, 21 (19): 21817- 21828.
28	WANG Z, SHU X H. Feature selection for Bayesian inference network in radar jamming effect analysis[C]//Proc. of the IEEE 6th International Conference on Signal and Image Processing, 2021: 620-623.
29	DILEEP M V , YU B , KIM S , et al. Task assignment for deploying unmanned aircraft as decoys[J]. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 2020, 18 (12): 3204- 3217.
30	全英汇, 方文, 高霞, 等. 捷变频雷达导引头技术现状与发展趋势[J]. 航空兵器, 2021, 28 (3): 1- 9.
	QUAN Y H , FANG W , GAO X , et al. Review on frequency agile radar seeker[J]. Aero Weaponry, 2021, 28 (3): 1- 9.
31	WU Z D , HU S L , LUO Y S , et al. Optimal distributed cooperative jamming resource allocation for multi-missile threat scenario[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2022, 16 (1): 113- 128.

含义(单位)	符号
ASM雷达发射功率/kW	P_t
干扰机发射功率/kW	P_j
ASM天线方向增益	G_t
干扰机天线方向增益	G_j
舰船雷达截面积/m²	σ
干扰损失系数	κ
ASM的距离/m	R

导弹	诱饵
导弹	Y＜Y_e	Y_e＜Y＜Rθ_0.5	Y＞Rθ_0.5
R＜R_e	干扰失效	条件冲突	不可干扰
R＞R_e	干扰失效	干扰有效	不可干扰

情形	R/m	Y/m	DOA/(°)	结果
1	6 000	200	(90~120)	成功
2	4 000	350	(90~120)	失败
3	5 000	250	(60~90)	成功
4	4 000	200	(170~180)	成功

[1]	Rui LI, Mengtao ZHU, Yunjie LI. Online evaluation method of radar jamming effect based on inverse filtering processing [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(9): 2706-2717.
[2]	Weijian SI, Yue ZHANG, Zhian DENG. Connected k-nearest neighbor clustering algorithm for radar signal sorting [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(8): 2463-2470.
[3]	Jinwei JIA, Zhuangzhi HAN, Limin LIU, Hui XIE. Design principle of radar radio frequency stealth signal based on SDIF threshold failure [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(6): 1693-1701.
[4]	Siyu DU, Zhixing LIU, Yaojun WU, Minghui SHA, Yinghui QUAN. Frequency agility waveform combined with time-frequency filter to suppress interrupted-sampling repeater jamming [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(12): 3819-3827.
[5]	Luda ZHAO, Bin WANG, Wei ZENG. Three-level programming model of electronic countermeasures force requirements in offensive combat [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(6): 1564-1571.
[6]	Bokai ZHANG, Weigang ZHU. Construction and key technologies of cognitive jamming decision-making system against MFR [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(9): 1969-1975.
[7]	MAO Hu, WU Dewei, LU Hu. Parameters configuration and effectiveness analysis of multiple-tone jamming to GPS receiver [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(8): 1699-1704.
[8]	MO Cuiqiong, BAO Zhichao, SUN Jie. Evaluation on radar seeker jamming effects based on Vague sets [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39(12): 2691-2696.
[9]	ZHENG Wen-xiu. Period estimation of PN sequence based on wavelet transform [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 33(4): 900-903.
[10]	RUAN Min-zhi, WANG Hong-jun, LI Qing-min, YU Zhi-liang, DU Juan. Efficiency evaluation of multi-jamming sources on stand-off jamming based on the exposed range [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 31(9): 2110-2113,2128.

Research on outboard active decoy jamming evaluation method based on probabilistic reasoning

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 18

References 31

Related Articles 10

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments