基于FA-ER的装备保障资源供给能力评估方法

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.03.017

Abstract

Abstract:

For the problems of strong subjectivity of evaluation information and low reliability of the results in the evaluation of the supply capability of equipment support resources, an evaluation method based on firefly algorithm and evidential reasoning (FA-ER) is proposed. The range of initial weights is determined by dealing with information under uncertainty according to intuitionistic fuzzy entropy. The weights calculation for evidential reasoning are transformed into a nonlinear multi-objective optimization problem by combining with the regret function. The firefly algorithm is used to solve optimal parameters, and then the optimal evaluation model and the final evaluation result are determined. The results of numerical example analysis show that the proposed method can effectively solve the problem of strong subjectivity of evaluation and improve the accuracy of evaluation results. The proposed method has good applicability to the evaluation of the supply capability of equipment support resources.

Key words: equipment support resources, supply capability assessment, firefly algorithm, evidential reasoning, regret function

CLC Number:

TP181

Yan LI, Yunxiang CHEN, Chengkun LUO, Zhongyi CAI. Evaluation method for the supply capability of equipment support resources based on FA-ER[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(3): 630-637.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Fig.3

Fig.4

Table 5

Fig.5

Fig.6

References 30

1	单志伟. 装备综合保障工程[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2007: 332- 335.
	SHAN Z W . Equipment comprehensive protection project[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2007: 332- 335.
2	杨晶, 黎放, 狄鹏. 改进BP网络的舰船装备保障资源保障能力评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2012, 37 (2): 65- 67, 71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2012.02.018
	YANG J , LI F , DI P . Support ability evaluation of ship equipment support ability resources based on improved BP network[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2012, 37 (2): 65- 67, 71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2012.02.018
3	KHALEIE S , FASANGHARI M , TAVASSOLIE E . Supplier selection using a novel intuitionist fuzzy clustering approach[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2012, 12 (6): 1741- 1754. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2012.01.017
4	刘满凤, 任海平. 基于一类新的直觉模糊熵的多属性决策方法研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2015, 35 (11): 2909- 2916. doi: 10.12011/1000-6788(2015)11-2909
	LIU M F , REN H P . A study of multi-attribute decision making based on a new intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measure[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2015, 35 (11): 2909- 2916. doi: 10.12011/1000-6788(2015)11-2909
5	BASKIR M B , TURKSEN I B , SAATCIOGLU O . An alternative fuzzy evaluation framework for supplier[J]. International Journal of Applied Management Science, 2017, 9 (3): 169- 187. doi: 10.1504/IJAMS.2017.086638
6	TOORANLOO H S , IRANPOUR A . Supplier selection and evaluation using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy AHP method[J]. International Journal of Procurement Management, 2017, 10 (5): 539- 554. doi: 10.1504/IJPM.2017.086399
7	SEN D K , DATTA S , MAHAPATRA S S , et al. Sustainable supplier selection in intuitionistic fuzzy environment: a decision making perspective[J]. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 2018, 25 (2): 545- 574. doi: 10.1108/BIJ-11-2016-0172
8	FATRIAS D , KAMIL I , MEILANI D . An integrative multi-criteria decision making techniques for supplier evaluation problem with its application[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, 319, 012076. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/319/1/012076
9	陈国钦, 张尊泉, 张伟. 基于证据理论的雷达装备规划保障资源能力评估方法[J]. 现代电子技术, 2005, 28 (21): 11- 13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-373X.2005.21.004
	CHEN G Q , ZHANG Z Q , ZHANG W . One method to assess the ability of planning guaranteed resources of radar equipment based on DS evidence theory[J]. Modern Electronic Technique, 2005, 28 (21): 11- 13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-373X.2005.21.004
10	胡丽芳, 初军田, 李强. 一种基于投影多属性决策的证据推理方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2015, 30 (2): 261- 265.
	HU L F , CHU J T , LI Q . An evidence reasoning approach based on projection multi-attributedecision making[J]. Control and Decision, 2015, 30 (2): 261- 265.
11	ZHOU M , LIU X B , YANG J B . Evidential reasoning approach for MADM based on incomplete interval value[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2017, 33 (6): 3707- 3721.
12	周志杰, 刘涛源, 李方志, 等. 一种基于证据推理的装备保障资源评估方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2018, 33 (6): 1048- 1054.
	ZHOU Z J , LIU T Y , LI F Z . An evaluation method of equipment support resources based on evidential reasoning[J]. Control and Decision, 2018, 33 (6): 1048- 1054.
13	MOHAMMADI S E , MAKUI A . Multi-attribute group decision making approach based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and evidential reasoning methodology[J]. Soft Computing, 2017, 21 (17): 5061- 5080. doi: 10.1007/s00500-016-2101-6
14	刘文清, 王应明, 蓝以信. 不完全信息下基于证据推理的直觉模糊多属性决策方法[J]. 统计与决策, 2018, 34 (15): 42- 45.
	LIU W Q , WANG Y L , LAN Y X . An intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making method based on evidential reasoning under incomplete information[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2018, 34 (15): 42- 45.
15	FU C , CHANG W J , XU D L , et al. An evidential reasoning approach based on criterion reliability and solution reliability[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2019, 128, 401- 417.
16	YANG X S . Firefly algorithm, stochastic test functions and design optimization[J]. International Journal of Bio-inspired Computation, 2010, 2 (2): 78- 84. doi: 10.1504/IJBIC.2010.032124
17	ZHOU M , LIU X B , CHEN Y W . Evidential reasoning rule for MADM with both weights and reliabilities in group decision making[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2018, 143, 142- 161. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2017.12.013
18	YANG J B . Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 131 (1): 31- 61.
19	李欣屹, 王强, 周洪斌, 等. 基于ANP-灰色模糊的航空装备维修保障能力评估[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2018, 43 (3): 100- 106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2018.03.022
	LI X Y , WANG Q , ZHOU H B , et al. Research on evaluation of aeronautic equipment maintenance support capability based on ANP-GF[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2018, 43 (3): 100- 106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0640.2018.03.022
20	YANG J B, LIU J, WANG J, et al. Belief rule-base inference methodology using the evidential reasoning approach-RIME[J]. IEEE Trans.on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans, 2006, 36(2): 266-285.
21	陈云翔, 王攀, 罗承昆. 基于证据理论的偏好型直觉模糊群决策方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2017, 32 (5): 947- 953.
	CHEN Y X , WANG P , LUO C K . Method for intuitionistic fuzzy group decision-making with preference based on evidence theory[J]. Control and Decision, 2017, 32 (5): 947- 953.
22	BURILLO P , BUSTINCE H . Entropy on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and on interval-valued fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996, 78, 305- 316. doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(96)84611-2
23	王新霞, 陈孝国. 直觉模糊熵的改进研究[J]. 齐齐哈尔大学学报, 2015, 31 (4): 11- 13.
	WANG X X , CHEN X G . Study on improvement of intuitionistic fuzzy entropy[J]. Journal of Qiqihar University, 2015, 31 (4): 11- 13.
24	徐倩, 唐胜景, 郭杰, 等. 基于后悔函数的多目标优化决策问题研究[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2010, 30 (7): 803- 806, 834.
	XU Q , TANG S J , GUO J . Decision-making problem analysis for multi-objective optimization based on regret-function[J]. Transaction of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2010, 30 (7): 803- 806, 834.
25	ZHOU Z J, HU G Y. A model for hidden behaviour prediction of complex systems based on belief rule base and power set[J]. IEEE Trans.on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2017, 99: 1-7.
26	张仲敏, 李俊山, 宋凭, 等. 一种基于模糊层次分析的多Agent电子对抗装备状态智能评判方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35 (4): 516- 522. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.04.013
	ZHANG Z M , LI J S , SONG P . A multi-agent intelligent decision approach based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for service status of electronic countermeasures equipment[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35 (4): 516- 522. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.04.013
27	SHATHANAA R , RAMASUBRAMANIAN N . Group influence based improved firefly algorithm for design space exploration of datapath resource allocation[J]. Applied Intelligence, 2019, 49 (6): 2084- 2100. doi: 10.1007/s10489-018-1371-3
28	ZHANG F Q , HUI J Z , ZHU B , et al. An improved firefly algorithm for collaborative manufacturing chain optimization problem[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 2019. doi: 10.1177/0954405418789981
29	ZHOU L Y , DING L X , MA M D , et al. An accurate partially attracted firefly algorithm[J]. Computing, 2019, 101 (5): 477- 493. doi: 10.1007/s00607-018-0645-2
30	KHALIFEHZADEH S , FAKHRZAD M B . A modified firefly algorithm for optimizing a multi stage supply chain network with stochastic demand and fuzzy production capacity[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2019, 133, 42- 56.

指标	< μ_i, v_i, κ_i>
x₁	< 0.812 5, 0.175 0, 0.012 5>
x₂	< 0.787 5, 0.212 5, 0.000 0>
x₃	< 0.837 5, 0.162 5, 0.000 0>
x₄	< 0.825 0, 0.150 0, 0.025 0>
x₅	< 0.950 0, 0.050 0, 0.000 0>
x₆	< 0.862 5, 0.125 0, 0.012 5>

指标权重	ω₁	ω₂	ω₃	ω₄	ω₅	ω₆
初始权重	0.155 0	0.148 0	0.160 0	0.159 8	0.207 6	0.169 6
区间上限	0.350 7	0.438 8	0.190 0	0.190 0	0.231 7	0.358 7
区间下限	0.112 9	0	0.121 1	0.053 3	0.123 8	0

指标权重	ω₁	ω₂	ω₃	ω₄	ω₅	ω₆
权重值	0.112 9	0.112 9	0.113 6	0.115 0	0.350 7	0.194 9

差	基本满足	满足	好	H	效用值	后悔值
${\hat \beta }$₁	${\hat \beta }$₂	${\hat \beta }$₃	${\hat \beta }$₄	${\hat \beta }$_H	${\bar D}$(X)	F(${\bar D}$(X))
0.009 5	0.082 2	0.752 6	0.154 6	0.001 1	0.790 5	0.052 9

评价方法	${\bar D}$(X)	F(${\bar D}$(X))
FA-ER	0.790 5	0.052 9
P-CMA-ES-ER	0.784 5	0.064 9
专家打分法-ER	0.665 8	0.160 8
直觉模糊熵-ER	0.711 5	0.123 2
fuzzy sets—AHP	0.702 3	∅

Evaluation method for the supply capability of equipment support resources based on FA-ER

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 30

Related Articles 9

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Dali ZHANG, Hongwei XIA, Chaoxing ZHANG, Guangcheng MA, Changhong WANG. Improved firefly algorithm and its convergence analysis [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(4): 1291-1300.
[2]	Liwei QIAN, Xiangqian XU, Yajie DOU, Yuejin TAN. System capability requirements recommendation method based on RIMER method [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(12): 3719-3727.
[3]	Lei LAI, Kun ZOU, Dewei WU, Baozhong LI. Multi-UAV cooperative path planning based on improved MOFA evolution of interactive strategy [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(8): 2282-2289.
[4]	Jing BAI, Yehua CHEN, Rui SHI, Yaming ZHANG. Emergency decision-making based on the reliability distribution of weighted cross entropy in probabilistic language [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(2): 476-486.
[5]	Lei LAI, Dewei WU, Kun ZOU, Kun HAN, Hailin LI. Three dimensional route planning of UAV based on the multi-criterion interactive membrane evolutionary algorithm [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(1): 138-146.
[6]	Leiyu CHEN, Zhijie ZHOU, Shuaiwen TANG, You CAO. Weapon equipment performance evaluation method with multi-information fusion [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(7): 1527-1533.
[7]	Yan LI, Yunxiang CHEN, Chengkun LUO, Zhongyi CAI. Multi-attribute decision making method based on probabilistic hesitant-intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and evidential reasoning [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(5): 1116-1123.
[8]	CHEN Sheng-qun, WANG Ying-ming. Evidential reasoning based on negotiation [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38(4): 859-865.
[9]	FAN Yang-tao, WANG Min-le, WEN Miao-miao, CHEN Da-lei. Analysis of ballistic missile penetration effectiveness based on FA-AHP [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37(4): 845-850.