可重复使用运载器多约束鲁棒预测校正制导

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2021.05.20

Abstract

Abstract:

Aiming at general constraints, waypoint constraint, reverse rate constraint of bank angle and parameter uncertainties for reusable launch vehicles (RLVs) during re-entry, a kind of robust predictor-corrector guidance method meeting multiple constraints is proposed. Firstly, the modified quasi-equilibrium glide condition is exploited to transform general constraints into the amplitude constraint of bank angle. Secondly, a dichotomy-based waypoint guidance law is presented to speedily determine the reverse position of bank angle, and the reverse rate constraint is converted to that of energy which can be calculated during the prediction correction process. Next, an online adjustment strategy of angle of attack and cross-range error corridor based on the nominal lift-drag-ratio and residual energy is proposed to deal with the parameter uncertainty robust guidance issue. Simulation tests show that the RLV can satisfy multiple constraints and terminal guidance requirement in the presence of parameter uncertainties, which verifies the effectiveness and robustness of the presented method.

Key words: reusable launch vehicle (RLV), re-entry guidance, multiple constraints, predictor-corrector guidance, robust guidance

CLC Number:

V448.2

Yanli DU, Wu LIU, Mingming TANG, Yuhui WANG. Robust predictor-corrector guidance with multiple constraints for reusable launch vehicles[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(5): 1316-1325.

Figures/Tables 18

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Table 1

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Table 2

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

Fig.15

Fig.16

References 30

1	SIVAN K , PANDIAN S . An overview of reusable launch vehicle technology demonstrator[J]. Current Science, 2018, 114 (1): 38- 47. doi: 10.18520/cs/v114/i01/38-47
2	NAIR P G, JOSHI A. Effect of maximum angle of attack on path constraints and flyability for winged re-entry vehicles[C]//Proc. of the AIAA SciTech Forum, 2019: 0263.
3	LU P . Entry guidance: a unified method[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2014, 37 (3): 713- 728. doi: 10.2514/1.62605
4	XUE S B , LU P . Constrained predictor-corrector entry guidance[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2010, 33 (4): 1273- 1281. doi: 10.2514/1.49557
5	SAGLIANO M, MOOIJ E. Optimal drag-energy entry guidance via pseudo spectral convex optimization[C]//Proc. of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2018: 1315.
6	WEBB K, LU P. Entry guidance by onboard trajectory planning and tracking[C]//Proc. of the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechamics Conference, 2016.
7	HE R Z , LIU L H , TANG G J , et al. Rapid generation of entry trajectory with multiple no-fly zone constraints[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2017, 60, 1430- 1442. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2017.06.046
8	ZHAO D J , SONG Z Y . Reentry trajectory optimization with waypoint and no-fly zone constraints using multi-phase convex programming[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2017, 137, 60- 69. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.04.013
9	LU Q , ZHOU J . Re-entry guidance for hypersonic vehicle satisfying no-fly zone constraints[J]. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 2018, 40 (13): 3899- 3908. doi: 10.1177/0142331217735050
10	JORRIS T R , COBB R G . Three-dimensional trajectory optimization satisfying waypoint and no-fly zone constraints[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2009, 32 (2): 551- 572. doi: 10.2514/1.37030
11	ZHANG H P , WANG H L , LI N , et al. Time-optimal memetic whale optimization algorithm for hypersonic vehicle reentry trajectory optimization with no-fly zones[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2018, 32, 2735- 2749. doi: 10.1007/s00521-018-3764-y
12	YONG E M , QIAN W Q , HE K F . An adaptive predictor corrector reentry guidance based on self-definition waypoints[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2014, 39, 211- 221. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2014.08.004
13	LI Z H , YANG X J , SUN X D , et al. Improved artificial potential field based lateral entry guidance for waypoints passage and no-fly zones avoidance[J]. Aerospace Science and Techno-logy, 2019, 86, 119- 131. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.01.015
14	LIN H B, DU Y L, MOOIJ E, et al. Improved predictor-corrector guidance with hybrid lateral logic for no-fly zone avoidance[C]//Proc. of the International Conference on Control, Automation and Information Sciences, 2019.
15	GAO Y , CAI G B , YANG X G , et al. Improved tentacle-based guidance for reentry gliding hypersonic vehicle with no-fly zone constraint[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 119246- 119258. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2936974
16	LIANG Z X , REN Z . Tentacle-based guidance for entry flight with no-fly zone constraint[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamic, 2018, 41 (4): 991- 1000.
17	WANG T , ZHANG H B , TANG G J . Predictor-corrector entry guidance with waypoint and no-fly zone constraints[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2017, 138, 10- 18. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.05.009
18	LIANG Z X , LI Q D , REN Z . Waypoint constrained guidance for entry vehicles[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2016, 52, 52- 61. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2016.02.023
19	LIANG Z X , LONG J T , ZHU S Y , et al. Entry guidance with terminal approach angle constraint[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 102, 1058- 1076.
20	LI S , JIANG X Q . RBF neural network based second-order sliding mode guidance for Mars entry uncertainties[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015, 43, 226- 235. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2015.03.006
21	景亮, 张忠阳, 崔乃刚, 等. 固定时间收敛扰动观测终端滑模制导律设计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (8): 1820- 1826.
	JING L , ZHANG Z Y , CUI N G , et al. Fixed-time disturbance observer based terminal sliding mode guidance law[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (8): 1820- 1826.
22	XU J W , QIAO J Z , GUO L , et al. Enhanced predictor-corrector mars entry guidance approach with atmospheric uncertainties[J]. IET Control Theory and Applications, 2019, 13 (11): 1612- 1618. doi: 10.1049/iet-cta.2018.5782
23	XI Y H , PENG H , MO H . Parameter estimation of RBF-AR model based on the EM-EKF algorithm[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2017, 43 (9): 1636- 1643.
24	LU P , BRUNNER C W , STACHOWIAK S J , et al. Verification of a fully numerical entry guidance algorithm[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2017, 40 (2): 230- 248. doi: 10.2514/1.G000327
25	江振宇, 孙乐园, 王晋璘, 等. 环境参数在线辨识及其在滑翔段制导中的应用[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2018, 40 (2): 48- 54.
	JIANG Z Y , SUN L Y , WANG J L , et al. Environmental parameter online identification and its application in gliding guidance[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2018, 40 (2): 48- 54.
26	MOOIJ E. The Horus-2B reference vehicle, Memorandum M-692[R]. Delft: Delft University of Technology, 1995.
27	张鹏, 都延丽, 项凯. 高升阻比RLV的约束预测校正再入制导[J]. 飞行力学, 2018, 36 (3): 70- 74.
	ZHANG P , DU Y L , XIANG K . Constrained predictive-corrector reentry guidance for high lift-to-drag RLV[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2018, 36 (3): 70- 74.
28	朱凯, 齐乃明, 秦昌茂. 动态航向角误差走廊的侧向制导策略[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2011, 43 (1): 31- 35.
	ZHU K , QI N M , QIN C M . A lateral guidance method with dynamic heading error corridor[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2011, 43 (1): 31- 35.
29	MOOIJ E, MEASE K D, BENITO J. Robust re-entry guidance and control system design and analysis[C]//Proc. of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2007: 6779.
30	SAUNDERS B R. Optimal trajectory design under uncertainty[D]. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012.

状态	h/km	θ/(°)	φ/(°)	V/(m/s)	γ/(°)	Ψ/(°)
初始	122	-106.7	-22.3	7435.5	-1.43	70.75
终端	25	-53	5.1	738	-	-

参数	取值	参数	取值
h/km	±1	Ψ/(°)	±0.05
θ/(°)	±0.5	m/kg	±100
φ/(°)	±0.5	C_D	±15%
V/(m/s)	±15	C_L	15%
γ/(°)	±0.05	-	-

[1]	Shang JIANG, Bo WEI, Weige LIANG, Dongyan SUN, Jinjun LI, Ye MA. Integrated guidance and control design method with multiple constraints and backlash [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(4): 1318-1328.
[2]	Shiyan SUN, Shang JIANG, Fuqing TIAN, Weige LIANG. Distributed adaptive cooperative guidance law of multiple projectiles with multiple constraints [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(1): 181-190.
[3]	SUN Guoxin, XIA Qunli, ZHANG Daochi, XU Wenbo. Piecewise guidance strategy of auto landing for reusable launch vehicle [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(4): 856-862.
[4]	MAO Boyuan, LI Junlong, ZHANG Rui. Midcourse guidance law with multiple constraints considering missile’s dynamics of autopilot [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(2): 382-388.
[5]	MENG Ke-zi, ZHOU Di. Design of optimal midcourse guidance law with multiple constraints [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38(1): 116-122.
[6]	CHEN Zhe, TANG Shengjing, GUO Jie. Energy management based guidance of solid rocket with multi constraints [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 36(12): 2484-2489.
[7]	HE Cheng-long, CHEN Xin, YANG Yi-dong. Mixed programming control allocation for reusable launch vehicles using dynamic inverse calculating [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(9): 1973-1976.
[8]	ZHANG Jun, HUANG Yi-ming, Yang Yi-dong. Research on 3-D guidance trajectory propagation of terminal area energy management for RLVs [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(8): 1727-1731.

Robust predictor-corrector guidance with multiple constraints for reusable launch vehicles

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 18

References 30

Related Articles 8

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments