基于网络化指标的数据链作战保障能力评估模型研究

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.08.09

Abstract

Abstract:

In view of the difficulties in describing the operational mechanism and capability of the data link supporting the kill chain, it is urgent to carry out an evaluation of the operational support capability of the data link to explore the weak links and actual needs of the data link equipment system. However, the coupled internal structure and diverse external application methods of data link equipment make existing evaluation frameworks difficult to apply. Therefore, a new dynamic evaluation framework that adapts to the evaluation requirements is established based on the characteristics of data link operational support capability evaluation, especially the networked characteristics of the evaluation index system. Based on the characteristics of data chain support capabilities, a networked evaluation index system is established, combining the dynamic evaluation methods to form a comprehensive evaluation model. The application case shows that the designed data link operational support capability evaluation model can not only reasonably and effectively evaluate the data link operational support capability, but also improve the existing data link equipment service elements and enhance the level of operational support capability.

Key words: data link, kill chain, operational support capability, dynamic evaluation, networking evaluation index system

CLC Number:

TP391.9

Yanyan HUANG, Kaisheng WANG, Yu'ang SHI. Research on an evaluation model for data link operational support capability based on networking index[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(8): 2361-2369.

Figures/Tables 17

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Table 1

Table 2

Basic support capability indices"

指标编号	指标名称	指标含义
S11	网络覆盖率	作战区域网络覆盖率
S12	动态组网与接入能力	数据链系统实现基于作战任务的作战力量、编成、指挥关系临机调整能力
S13	平台临机入网成功率	平台在任务周期内的入网成功率
S14	网络动态重组成功率	网络在任务周期内的动态重组成功率
S15	智能化应用能力	数据链系统运维管理效率
S16	智能任务规划成果采纳率	在任务周期内智能任务规划成果采纳比例
S17	智能资源调整决策效率	在任务周期内智能资源调整方案采纳比例
S18	数据链传输效率	信息传输速率
S21	格式化信息保障率	在数据链网络中传输的格式化信息占信息总量的比例
S22	战术信息端到端传输时延	战术消息接收端比发送端收到消息的时间延迟
S23	战术信息传输成功率	战术消息从发送端成功送达接收端的概率
S31	目标共享完整性	数据链系统对作战区域内目标掌握程度
S32	目标属性识别率	数据链系统对目标属性识别的准确程度
S33	目标按需共享能力	数据链系统中平台共享态势资源池中目标的能力
S34	目标连续性	数据链系统掌握目标信息的持续性
S41	目标发现贡献度	任务周期内平台发现目标数量占目标总量的比例
S42	目标识别贡献度	任务周期内平台识别目标数量占目标总量的比例
S51	目标指示成功率	任务周期内平台为其他平台指示目标数量占目标总量的比例
S52	协同打击/探测成功率	任务周期内平台与其他平台成功进行协同打击/探测的目标数量占总量比例
S61	网络成员状态掌控率	任务周期内对网络成员状态信息的掌握程度
S62	指挥引导成功率	任务周期内平台利用数据链成功实施指挥引导次数占总次数的比例

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Fig.6

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

Table 9

Table 10

Fig.7

References 20

1	鲁统亮, 陈文豪, 葛冰峰, 等. 信息支援下的作战体系多层网络建模[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44 (2): 520- 528.
	LU T L , CHEN W H , GE B F , et al. Multi-layer network modeling for combat system-of-systems under information support[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44 (2): 520- 528.
2	RICE R E . Calculating the probability of successfully executing the kill chain to analyze hypersonics[J]. Phalanx, 2022, 55 (1): 22- 27.
3	浣顺启, 方哲梅, 王剑波. 基于功能依赖网的体系效能评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44 (7): 2191- 2200.
	HUAN Q S , FANG Z M , WANG J B . System-of-systems effectiveness evaluation method based on functional dependency network[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44 (7): 2191- 2200.
4	CHEN Z , ZHAI R , LI D C , et al. Performance evaluation of a tactical data-link system based on MSK and 16QAM[J]. IEEE Access, 2021, 9, 84316- 84326. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3086048
5	江汉, 尹浩, 李学军, 等. C4ISR体系对抗仿真中的信息优势度量[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2006, 28 (1): 88-90, 159
	JIANG H , YIN H , LI X J , et al. Measure of information superiority in simulation of C4ISR gaming[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2006, 28 (1): 88-90, 159
6	JI X D , WEI H X , CHEN Y D , et al. A three-stage dynamic assessment framework for industrial control system security based on a method of W-HMM[J]. Sensors, 2022, 22 (7): 2593. doi: 10.3390/s22072593
7	LIN T , XUE X Z , LU C Y . Methods for developing a net shape ecological indicator system and assigning rational weights to the indicators[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27 (1): 235- 241. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.01.028
8	HUANG Y Y . Modeling and simulation method of the emergency response systems based on OODA[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2015, 89, 527- 540. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.08.020
9	MA B L , LIU D S . Construction method of the assessment index framework in operation systems[J]. Command Control and Simulation, 2021, 43 (2): 50- 56.
10	QIU Z R . Establishment and countermeasures of smart city security risk assessment model[J]. Advances in Computer and Communication, 2023, 3 (2): 70- 73. doi: 10.26855/acc.2022.12.003
11	TIAN F P , WEN B , XIONG Z G . Operation scheme evaluation based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and battle simulation[J]. Command Control and Simulation, 2016, 38 (3): 28- 32.
12	WANG K , WANG J L , ZHAO D B , et al. Evaluation approach for requirement satisfactory degree of armored equipment demonstration[J]. Journal of Academy of Armored Force Engineering, 2016, 30 (2): 6- 11.
13	GENG Z, HUANG Y Y, ZHANG H, et al. Improved sparrow search algorithm applied to multi-stage weapon target assignment[C]//Proc of the International Conference on Cyber-Physical Social Intelligence, 2022: 98-103.
14	宁晓燕, 王影, 孙志国, 等. 多音干扰下Nakagami-m信道传输Link16数据链的性能分析[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45 (2): 566- 571.
	NING X Y , WANG Y , SUN Z G , et al. Performance analysis of Nakagami-m channel transmission Link16 under multi-tone interference[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45 (2): 566- 571.
15	闫云斌, 崔雪炜, 王永川, 等. 无人机数据链系统抗干扰性能评估方法研究[J]. 海军工程大学学报, 2017, 29 (5): 92- 96.
	YAN Y B , CUI X W , WANG Y C , et al. Research on anti-jamming evaluation method for unmanned aerial vehicle data link[J]. Journal of Naval University of Engineering, 2017, 29 (5): 92- 96.
16	马宁, 林圣琳. 面向多装备协同的体系效能仿真评估方法[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2020, 32 (6): 1155- 1163.
	MA N , LIN S L . Simulation-based effectiveness evaluation for system-of-system under multi-equipment collaboration[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2020, 32 (6): 1155- 1163.
17	FELIPE F . Enhancing the effectiveness of air defense systems through simulation analysis[J]. International Journal of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 2021, 15 (6): 395- 409.
18	ZHANG Y , SI G Y , WANG Y Z . Modelling and simulation of cognitive electronic attack under the condition of system of systems combat[J]. Defence Science Journal, 2020, 70 (2): 183- 189.
19	KOO H , MOON I . Wartime logistics model for multi-support unit location-allocation problem with frontline changes[J]. International Transactions in Operational Research, 2020, 27 (6): 3031- 3055.
20	RAZ A K , WOOD P C , MOCKUS L , et al. System of systems uncertainty quantification using machine learning techniques with smart grid application[J]. Systems Engineering, 2020, 23 (6): 770- 782.

含义	相对重要度
两指标同等重要	1
比另一指标略微重要	3
比另一指标明细重要	5
比另一指标强烈重要	7
比另一指标极端重要	9
为上述重要程度的中间值	2, 4, 6, 8
为上述重要程度的相反表达	1/3, 1/5, …

编号	指标名称	指标含义
B1	综合组网运用结果	网络层映射的数据链综合组网运用结果
B2	战术信息保障结果	网络层映射的数据链战术信息保障结果
B3	战场态势共享结果	网络层映射的数据链战场态势共享结果
B4	电子战应用结果	网络层映射的数据链电子战应用结果
B5	战术协同结果	网络层映射的数据链战术协同结果
B6	指挥控制结果	网络层映射的数据链指挥控制结果

编号	指标名称	指标含义
A1	综合组网运用保障能力	数据链作战保障中的综合组网运用保障能力
A2	战术信息保障能力	数据链作战保障中的战术信息保障效能
A3	战场态势共享效能	数据链作战保障中的战场态势共享保障能力
A4	电子战应用效能	数据链作战保障中的电子战应用效能
A5	战术协同效能	数据链作战保障中的战术协同效能
A6	指挥控制效能	数据链作战保障中的指挥控制效能

权重	指标编号
权重	S11	S12	S13	S14	S15	S16	S17
对B1权值	0.042 0	0.070 1	0.018 3	0.075 5	0.003 4	0.029 6	0.004 9
对B2权值	0.065 3	0.069 5	0.025 4	0.062 6	0.060 3	0.015 0	0.011 0
对B3权值	0.023 0	0.075 0	0.022 7	0.072 7	0.021 7	0.082 9	0.031 2
对B4权值	0.008 2	0.005 8	0.057 3	0.084 1	0.100 9	0.014 0	0.061 4
对B5权值	0.007 8	0.021 4	0.085 5	0.014 3	0.077 3	0.050 4	0.093 3
对B6权值	0.023 2	0.033 6	0.018 6	0.017 3	0.110 8	0.073 9	0.070 1

权重	指标编号
权重	S18	S21	S22	S23	S31	S32	S33
对B1权值	0.010 4	0.088 1	0.074 3	0.033 9	0.101 7	0.003 7	0.046 9
对B2权值	0.045 9	0.088 4	0.031 3	0.053 9	0.020 6	0.069 2	0.023 5
对B3权值	0.017 5	0.022 4	0.055 0	0.042 2	0.031 4	0.074 1	0.052 2
对B4权值	0.050 7	0.001 3	0.036 4	0.017 5	0.085 8	0.033 6	0.057 1
对B5权值	0.007 3	0.041 4	0.010 0	0.090 1	0.000 4	0.072 6	0.076 5
对B6权值	0.018 5	0.108 7	0.079 3	0.044 7	0.065 4	0.051 2	0.009 7

权重	指标编号
权重	S34	S41	S42	S51	S52	S61	S62
对B1权值	0.040 8	0.081 9	0.085 1	0.020 0	0.052 4	0.047 7	0.069 1
对B2权值	0.046 6	0.064 4	0.082 0	0.088 3	0.050 4	0.012 8	0.013 7
对B3权值	0.049 1	0.081 8	0.025 5	0.067 6	0.067 3	0.033 9	0.050 7
对B4权值	0.017 9	0.065 0	0.028 4	0.070 6	0.074 4	0.080 8	0.048 7
对B5权值	0.081 3	0.007 9	0.037 4	0.024 3	0.074 9	0.040 4	0.085 3
对B6权值	0.030 6	0.015 7	0.023 4	0.030 6	0.053 2	0.006 3	0.115 1

指标项	权值	指标项	权值
A1	0.233 4	A4	0.261 7
A2	0.259 5	A5	0.181 2
A3	0.036 4	A6	0.027 9

Research on an evaluation model for data link operational support capability based on networking index

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 17

References 20

Related Articles 14

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

指标编号	指标值	指标编号	指标值
S11	0.872 6	S31	0.861 1
S12	0.867 1	S32	0.875 8
S13	0.872 8	S33	0.890 9
S14	0.893 6	S34	0.909 5
S15	0.881 1	S41	0.876 2
S16	0.942 3	S42	0.910 3
S17	0.893 0	S51	0.921 1
S18	0.868 5	S52	0.872 2
S21	0.940 5	S61	0.861 7
S22	0.948 0	S62	0.879 7
S23	0.893 9	-	-

指标项	效能值	指标项	效能值
A1	0.893 9	A4	0.885 4
A2	0.894 3	A5	0.891 7
A3	0.893 9	A6	0.898 4

[1]	Tong XU, Yazhou CHEN, Yuming WANG, Min ZHAO. Research on wideband white noise electromagnetic interference effect of UAV data link [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(7): 1965-1973.
[2]	Yaozu WANG, Bolin SHANG, Bifeng SONG, Pengfei LI, Erqin KE. Identification method of key node in operational system-of-systems network based on kill chain [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(3): 736-744.
[3]	Xiaoyan NING, Ying WANG, Zhiguo SUN, Hailing LUO. Performance analysis of Nakagami-m channel transmission Link16 under multi-tone interference [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(2): 566-571.
[4]	Yu FANG, Na LYU, Kun CHEN. Dynamic threshold algorithm for SPMA protocol in joint power domain [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(8): 2332-2340.
[5]	Lei YANG, Xinyao MAO, Xiaowei YANG, Hai ZHANG, Fei YANG, Lin SUN. Dynamic evaluation of radar performance index based on unsupervised Bayesian learning [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(1): 74-82.
[6]	LONG Lang, YANG Jun’an, LIU Hui, LIANG Zongwei. Blind identification of convolutional interleaver parameters based on zeromeanratio for common data link#br# [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40(8): 1702-1707.
[7]	TANG Xin, YANG Jianjun, FENG Song, REN Baoxiang. AR(p) dynamic catastrophe ranking method of target threat assessment under the loss of data [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39(5): 1058-1064.
[8]	LV Na, CHEN Ke-fan. Aeronautic swarm cloud network oriented MAC protocol for aviation data link [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38(5): 1164-.
[9]	ZHANG Wei-wei, DING Wen-rui, LIU Chun-hui. Prediction of interference effect on UAV data link in complex environment [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38(4): 760-766.
[10]	CHEN Chang-xing, NIU De-zhi, WANG Zhuo, FU Hui, TANG Dong-li, CHEN Qiang. Modeling of air combat based on effectiveness evaluation [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37(1): 79-84.
[11]	NIU De-zhi, CHEN Chang-xing, GENG Dao-tian, QU Kun, WANG Xu-jing, CHEN Qiang. Cooperative distance deployment of aircraft in combat based on data link [J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 36(10): 2018-2023.
[12]	LI Zhao-qiang， ZHOU De-yun. Buffetless discrete variable structure guidance law for UAV based on disturbance compensation [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(3): 655-659.
[13]	YANG Bao-ping, CHEN Yong-guang, CHEN Jun, XU Zhong-fu. Research on FPGA-based data multiplexing technology for TDLs relay transmission [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(12): 2628-2631.
[14]	HAN Song,ZHANG Xiao-lin,ZHAN Wei,XU Wen-jin. Information delivery model and delay analysis based on aerial command post [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 31(11): 2677-2681 .

指标项	效能值	指标项	效能值
A1	0.327 0	A4	0.405 8
A2	0.794 7	A5	0.513 4
A3	0.432 4	A6	0.634 4