基于资源感知与意图转译的路由协议切换研究

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2026.04.32

Abstract

Abstract:

Faced with dynamic network traffic and diverse user demands, existing routing protocol switching mechanisms lack dynamic adaptability. To address this, a routing protocol switching mechanism based on software for open networking in the cloud, which integrates resource awareness and intent refinement is designed. Resource awareness dynamically monitors key indicators such as computing resources and link status at each routing node, enabling real-time network situational awareness and feedback. Intent refinement converts users’ vague, high-level service requirements into measurable performance constraints and protocol preferences, driving adaptive protocol adjustments. The current research on routing protocol switching is firstly reviewed and the limitations in adaptability and flexibility of existing mechanisms are analyzed. Based on this, a decision model for protocol switching is constructed, incorporating resource awareness and intent translation, with an implementation process designed. Finally, experiments evaluate the mechanism’s response latency and communication overhead, and simulations in various traffic scenarios validate its feasibility. This research provides a novel solution to enhance the adaptability and flexibility of routing protocol switching in complex network environments.

Key words: routing protocol switching, software for open networking in the cloud, resource awareness, intent refinement

CLC Number:

TP 273

Yuanyuan LI, Tao FENG, Jiaorui HUANG, Chungang YANG. Routing protocol switching research based on resource awareness and intent refinement[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2026, 48(4): 1431-1440.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Table 1

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

References 22

1	KHAN I U, QURESHI I M, AZIZ M A, et al. Smart IoT control-based nature inspired energy efficient routing protocol for flying ad hoc network （FANET）[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 56371- 56378. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2981531
2	KAMBHAMPATI R T. Routing and switching: foundations of modern network design and implementation[J]. International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology, 2024, 15 (4): 610- 621.
3	JAIN N, PAYAL A, JAIN A. Effect of data packet size on the performance of RIP and OSPF routing protocols in hybrid networks[J]. International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications, 2021, 17 (4): 361- 376. doi: 10.1108/IJPCC-02-2021-0036
4	BIRADAR A G. A comparative study on routing protocols: RIP, OSPF and EIGRP and their analysis using GNS-3 [C]// Proc. of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering, 2020.
5	ALABADY S A, HAZIM S, SALIH A A M. Performance evaluation and comparison of dynamic routing protocols for suitability and reliability[J]. International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing, 2018, 11 (7): 41- 52. doi: 10.14257/ijgdc.2018.11.7.05
6	NARISETTY S K, BALSU S K. Performance comparison of EIGRP and ISIS/RIP protocols[J]. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Ad Hoc Networks, 2011, 3, 63- 66.
7	邵天竺, 王晓亮, 陈文龙, 等. 一种减少网络振动的智能路由选择算法设计[J]. 计算机研究与发展, 2021, 58 (6): 1261- 1274. doi: 10.7544/issn1000-1239.2021.20201073
	SHAO T Z, WANG X L, CHEN W L, et al. Design of an intelligent routing algorithm to reduce routing flap[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2021, 58 (6): 1261- 1274. doi: 10.7544/issn1000-1239.2021.20201073
8	KUMAR K P, SIVANESAN P. Cost optimized switching of routing protocol scheme for IoT applications[J]. Computer Systems Science and Engineering, 2022, 41 (1): 67- 82. doi: 10.32604/csse.2022.018867
9	MISRA S, BERA S, ACHU THAN ANDA M P, et al. Situation-aware protocol switching in software-defined wireless sensor network systems[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2018, 12 (3): 2353- 2360. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2017.2774284
10	KHALID N A, BAI Q, AL-ANBUKY A. Adaptive trust-based routing protocol for large scale WSNs[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7, 143539- 143549. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2944648
11	ABDOLLAHI M, ASHTARIS, ABOLHASANM, et al. Dynamic routing protocol selection in multi-hop device-to-device wireless networks[J]. IEEE Trans. on Vehicular Technology, 2022, 71 (8): 8796- 8809. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2022.3172923
12	张秀英. 智慧标识网络资源感知机制设计与实现 [D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2015.
	ZHANG X Y. Design and implementation of resource awareness mechanism in smart identification network [D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2015.
13	PANG L, YANG C G, CHEN D Y, et al. A survey on intent-driven networks[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8, 22862- 22873. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2969208
14	W3C. RDF 1.1 concepts and abstract syntax [EB/OL]. [2024-10-26] https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/.
15	刘人鹏, 胡博, 李鹤群. 星地融合网络中基于多目标优化的星间切换决策方法[J]. 天地一体化信息网络, 2023, 4 (3): 59- 66.
	LIU R P, HU B, LI H Q. Inter-satellite handover method based on multi-objective optimization in satellite-terrestrial integrated network[J]. Space-Integrated-Ground Information Networks, 2023, 4 (3): 59- 66.
16	ALDEA C L, BOCU R, SOLCA R N. Real-time monitoring and management of hardware and software resources in heterogeneous computer networks through an integrated system architecture[J]. Symmetry, 2023, 15, 1134. doi: 10.3390/sym15061134
17	CHENG S, SHI Y H, QIN Q D. On the performance metrics of multiobjective optimization [C]// Proc. of the Advances in Swarm Intelligence, 2012.
18	DEB K, JAIN H. An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, Part I: Solving problems with box constraints[J]. IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation, 2014, 18 (4): 577- 601. doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281535
19	李铭轩, 曹畅, 唐雄燕, 等. 基于可编程网络的UPF边缘调度机制研究[J]. 数据与计算发展前沿, 2022, 4 (2): 74- 86.
	LI M X, CAO C, TANG X Y, et al. Research on edge scheduling mechanism of UPF based on programmable network[J]. Frontiers of Data and Computing, 2022, 4 (2): 74- 86.
20	CHAUHAN D, SHARMA S. Performance evaluation of different routing protocols in IPv4 and IPv6 networks on the basis of packet sizes[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2015, 46, 1072- 1078. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.01.019
21	马武彬, 王锐, 王威超, 等. 基于进化多目标优化的微服务组合部署与调度策略[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42 (1): 90- 100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.01.13
	MA W B, WANG R, WANG W C, et al. Micro-service composition deployment and scheduling strategy based on evolutionary multi-objective optimization[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42 (1): 90- 100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.01.13
22	LI K, DEB K, YAO X Y. R-Metric: evaluating the performance of preference-based evolutionary multiobjective optimization using reference points[J]. IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation, 2018, 22 (6): 821- 835. doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2017.2737781

名称	描述	具体功能
Ubuntu系统	Ubuntu 22.04 LTS	仿真系统环境
GNS3	gns3 2.2.52	拓扑搭建平台
SONiC	sonic-vs4.22	网络操作系统
Docker	docker 27.3.1	将应用及依赖打包成功能容器
ETCD	etcd v3.5.8	存储资源数据
Python	python 3.10	系统后端环境
C++	c++ 20	模块开发
Drogon	drogon 1.9.8	C++ Web框架
Iperf3	iperf3 3.18	网络性能测试

Routing protocol switching research based on resource awareness and intent refinement

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 22

Related Articles 1

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments