基于协同战术识别的双机编队威胁评估方法

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.10.17

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

双机组成编队采用协同战术攻击目标是多机协同空战的一种主要形式。针对蓝方为双机编队的超视距空战威胁评估问题,提出了一种基于协同战术识别的威胁评估方法。首先,根据双机编队协同战术的分析、双机的空间占位与机动特性信息,采用动态贝叶斯网络建立目标双机编队协同战术识别模型。然后,根据目标飞行状态信息和目标机动动作识别结果,进行目标轨迹预测。最后,综合空间占位、探测、攻击、协同战术等威胁因子,考虑目标轨迹变化对战场态势演变的影响,建立威胁评估模型。仿真结果表明,所提方法能够准确识别双机编队的协同战术,实现合理化威胁评估。

关键词: 双机编队协同战术, 动态贝叶斯网络, 威胁评估模型, 目标轨迹预测

Abstract:

Adopting cooperative tactics of dual-aircraft formation to attack targets is one of the main forms of multi-aircraft cooperative air combat. Aiming at the problem of threat assessment of beyond visual range air combat in which the blue side is dual-aircraft formation, a threat assessment method based on cooperative tactical recognition is proposed. Firstly, based on the analysis of the cooperative tactics of dual-aircraft formation, space occupancy and maneuver characteristics information of dual-aircraft, the dynamic Bayesian network (BN) is used to establish the cooperative tactical recognition model of target dual-aircraft formation. Then, according to the target flight state information and the target maneuvering action recognition results, the prediction of the target trajectory is carried out. Finally, the threat assessment model is built by threat factors such as space occupancy, detection, attack, cooperative tactics and considering the impact of target trajectory changes on the battlefield situation evolution. Simulation results show that the proposed method can recognize the cooperative tactics of dual-aircraft formation accurately and realize reasonable threat assessment.

Key words: cooperative tactics of dual-aircraft formation, dynamic Bayesian network (DBN), threat assessment model, target trajectory prediction

中图分类号:

孟光磊, 周铭哲, 朴海音, 张慧敏. 基于协同战术识别的双机编队威胁评估方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(10): 2285-2293.

Guanglei MENG, Mingzhe ZHOU, Haiyin PIAO, Huimin ZHANG. Threat assessment method of dual-aircraft formation based on cooperative tactical recognition[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(10): 2285-2293.

图/表 17

表1

图1

表2

表3

图2

表4

表5

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

表6

图9

图10

图11

参考文献 31

1	HUANG Y Y . Modeling and simulation method of the emergency response systems based on OODA[J]. Knowledge Based Systems, 2015, 89 (3): 527- 540.
2	SHIN H , LEE J , KIM H , et al. An autonomous aerial combat framework for two-on-two engagements based on basic fighter maneuvers[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 72 (2): 305- 315.
3	XU X M , YANG R N , FU Y . Situation assessment for air combat based on novel semi-supervised naive Bayes[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 29 (4): 768- 779. doi: 10.21629/JSEE.2018.04.11
4	KUMAR S , TRIPATHI B K . Modelling of threat evaluation for dynamic targets using bayesian network approach[J]. Procedia Technology, 2016, 24, 1268- 1275. doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.05.112
5	DI R H , GAO X G , GUO Z G , et al. A threat assessment method for unmanned aerial vehicle based on Bayesian networks under the condition of small data sets[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, (5): 8484358.
6	PARK H , LEE B Y , TAHK M J , et al. Differential game based air combat maneuver generation using scoring function matrix[J]. International Journal of Aeronautical and S-pace Sciences, 2016, 17 (2): 204- 213. doi: 10.5139/IJASS.2016.17.2.204
7	XU Y J , WANG Y G , MIU X D . Multi-attribute decision ma-king method for air target threat evaluation based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electro-nics, 2012, 23 (6): 891- 897. doi: 10.1109/JSEE.2012.00109
8	AZIMIRAD E , HADDADNIA J . Target threat assessment using fuzzy sets theory[J]. Advances in Intelligent Information, 2015, 1 (2): 57- 74.
9	ZHAO H Y , MA W M , SUN B Z . A novel decision-making approach based on intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets[J]. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2017, 8 (4): 1107- 1117. doi: 10.1007/s13042-015-0481-z
10	AZADEH Z K , ADEM K , ABDUL R S . Application of a prefe-rence relationship in decision-making based on intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 34 (1): 123- 139.
11	ZHANG Q , HU J H , FENG J F , et al. Air multi-target threat assessment method based on improved GGIFSS[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2019, 36 (5): 4127- 4139.
12	AGARWAL M , BISWAS K K , HANMAN-DLU M . Genera-lized ntuitionistic fuzzy soft sets with applications in decision making[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2013, 13 (8): 3552- 3566. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2013.03.015
13	ZHANG K , KONG W R , LIU P P , et al. Assessment and sequencing of target threat based on intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and dynamic VIKOR[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 29 (2): 305- 310.
14	MA S D , ZHANG H Z , YANG G Q . Target threat level assessment based on cloud model under fuzzy and uncertain conditions in air combat simulation[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2017, 67 (4): 49- 53.
15	CHEN J , YU G H , GAO X G . Cooperative threat assessment of multi-aircrafts based on synthetic fuzzy cognitive map[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 2012, 17 (2): 228- 232. doi: 10.1007/s12204-012-1257-1
16	ZHU W L, ZANG Z Q, LI P J, et al. A method of radar threat identification based on entropy-TOPSIS[C]//Proc.of the 2nd International Conference on Electronic Information and Communication Technology, 2019: 896-899.
17	张浩为, 谢军伟, 葛佳昂, 等. 改进TOPSIS的多态融合直觉模糊威胁评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2018, 40 (10): 2263- 2269.
	ZHANG H W , XIE J W , GE J A , et al. Intuitionistic fuzzy set threat assessment based on improved TOPSIS and multiple times fusion[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 40 (10): 2263- 2269.
18	SUN H W , XIE X F . Threat evaluation method of warships formation air defense based on AR(p)-DITOPSIS[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 30 (2): 297- 307. doi: 10.21629/JSEE.2019.02.09
19	WANG B H, HUANG J G, QIN X S, et al. Research on FTOPSIS model of threat synthetic evaluation in multi-target tracing system[C]//Proc.of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2007: 35-39.
20	杨远志, 于雷, 周中良, 等. 基于RS_TOPSIS的空中目标威胁评估[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44 (5): 1001- 1007.
	YANG Y Z , YU L , ZHOU Z L , et al. Air target threat evalua-tion based on RS_TOPSIS[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018, 44 (5): 1001- 1007.
21	唐鑫, 杨建军, 冯松, 等. 数据缺失状态下目标威胁评估的AR(p)动态突变排序法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39 (5): 1058- 1064.
	TANG X , YANG J J , FENG S , et al. AR-(p) dynamic cata-strophe ranking method of target threat assessment under the loss of data[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39 (5): 1058- 1064.
22	孟光磊, 张慧敏, 朴海音, 等. 自动化飞行训练评估中的战机机动动作识别[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2020, 46 (7): 1267- 1274.
	MENG G L , ZHANG H M , PIAO H Y , et al. Recognition of fighter maneuver in automatic fight training evaluation[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020, 46 (7): 1267- 1274.
23	SCHREIER M , WILLERT V , ADAMY J . An integrated approach to maneuver based trajectory prediction and criticality assessment in arbitrary road environments[J]. IEEE Trans.on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2016, 17 (10): 2751- 2766. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2016.2522507
24	潘媚媚, 曹运合, 王宇, 等. 基于机动判别的变结构交互多模型跟踪算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41 (4): 730- 736.
	PAN M M , CAO Y H , WANG Y , et al. Variable structure interactive multi-model tracking algorithm based on maneuver discrimination[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41 (4): 730- 736.
25	NAEEM H , MASOOD A . An optimal dynamic threat evaluation and weapon scheduling technique[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2010, 23 (4): 337- 342.
26	YANG X Y , WANG J K , ZHU R D . Random walks for synthetic aperture radar image fusion in framelet domain[J]. IEEE Trans.on Image Processing, 2018, 27 (2): 851- 862. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2017.2747093
27	童奇, 李建勋, 童中翔, 等. 基于机动识别的空战意图威胁建模与仿真[J]. 现代防御技术, 2014, 42 (4): 174- 184.
	TONG Q , LI J X , TONG Z X , et al. Aircombat intention threat modeling and simulation based on maneuver recognition[J]. Mo-dern Defense Technology, 2014, 42 (4): 174- 184.
28	SHEN M X , XU J , ZHENG W T . Threaten assessment based on grey fixed weight cluster decision making for aerial target[J]. Advances in System Science and Applications, 2007, 7 (2): 218- 223.
29	ZHANG H X , KANG B Y , LI Y , et al. Target threat assessment based on interval data fusion[J]. Journal of Computational Information Systems, 2012, 6 (8): 2609- 2616.
30	SU W S , SHIN H S , CHEN L , et al. Cooperative interception strategy for multiple inferior missiles against one highly maneuvering target[J]. Aerospace Science and technology, 2018, 80 (9): 91- 100.
31	HUANG C Q , DONG K S , HUANG H , et al. Autonomous air combat maneuver decision using Bayesian inference and moving horizon optimization[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2018, 29 (1): 86- 97. doi: 10.21629/JSEE.2018.01.09

变量	协同战术	长机空间占位	长机机动特性	僚机空间占位	僚机机动特性
DA	尾后攻击战术	红方后方蓝方僚机前方	水平直线飞行	红方后方蓝方长机后方	水平直线飞行
PA	钳形攻击战术	红方前方蓝方僚机左/右方	左/右盘旋	红方前方蓝方长机左/右方	左/右盘旋
LA	侧方攻击战术	红方左/右方蓝方僚机前方	水平直线飞行	红方左/右方蓝方长机后方	水平直线飞行
EA	对头攻击战术	红方前方蓝方僚机后方	水平直线飞行	红方前方蓝方长机前方	先水平直线飞行后左/右盘旋
HDO	水平疏开战术	红方左/右方蓝方僚机左/右方	左/右盘旋	红方左/右方蓝方长机左/右方	左/右盘旋
VDO	垂直疏开战术	红方前/后方蓝方僚机上方	跃升机动	红方前方蓝方长机下方	俯冲机动
CDO	组合疏开战术	红方左/右方蓝方僚机上方	先跃升机动后左/右盘旋	红方左/右方蓝方长机下方	先俯冲机动后左/右盘旋

变量	变量含义	状态集
TAZ₁ TAZ₂	蓝方方位角	前方F(-45°~45°)、右方R(45°~135°)、左方L(-135°~-45°)后方B(-135°~-180 & 135°~180°)
ALT₁ ALT₂	蓝方相对高度	高于红方H(ALT＞500 m)E(-500 m＜ALT＜500 m)低于红方L(ALT＜-500 m)
TMI₁ TMI₂	蓝方机动特性	水平直线飞行、俯冲、跃升、左盘旋、右盘旋、半滚倒转、斤斗、左上战斗转弯、右上战斗转弯、蛇形机动
SCT	方位分类协同战术	前方类协同战术FC(EA/PA/VDO)侧方类协同战术LC(LA/HDO/CDO)尾后类协同战术BC(DA/VDO)其他方位类战术OC(VDO/CDO)
ICT	高度分类协同战术	前方高度保持类协同战术集FRC(EA/PA)、侧方高度保持类协同战术集LRC(LA/HDO)、垂直疏开战术(VDO)、组合疏开战术(CDO)、尾后攻击战术(DA)
CT	协同战术	对头攻击战术(EA)、侧方攻击战术(LA)、尾后攻击战术(DA)、钳形攻击战术(PA)、水平疏开战术(HDO)、垂直疏开战术(VDO)、组合疏开战术(CDO)

ICT	(H, E, L)
ICT	P(ALT₁\|ICT)	P(ALT₂\|ICT)
ICT_FR	(0.29, 0.42, 0.29)	(0.29, 0.42, 0.29)
ICT_LR	(0.29, 0.42, 0.29)	(0.29, 0.42, 0.29)
ICT_VDO	(0.39, 0.22, 0.39)	(0.39, 0.22, 0.39)
ICT_CDO	(0.36, 0.28, 0.36)	(0.36, 0.28, 0.36)
ICT_DA	(0.32, 0.36, 0.32)	(0.32, 0.36, 0.32)

因子	EA	LA	DA	PA	HDO	VDO	CDO
ν(i)	0.74	0.85	0.97	0.77	0.87	0.95	0.92
σ(i)	0.52	0.65	0.75	0.61	0.63	0.25	0.66

作战无人机	经度/(°)	纬度/(°)	高度/m	速度/(m/s)	航向/(°)
红方1号机	124.9	29.1	3 000	200	310
蓝方1号机	123.1	28.4	3 050	300	100
蓝方2号机	123.2	28.3	3 050	300	100