低信噪比下非冗余阵列的无网格DOA估计

doi:10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.02.04

系统工程与电子技术 ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 352-359.doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2023.02.04

• 电子技术 • 上一篇

低信噪比下非冗余阵列的无网格DOA估计

王宁¹^,²^,³^,*, 吕晓德¹^,², 李苗苗¹^,²^,³

1. 中国科学院空天信息创新研究院, 北京 100094
2. 微波成像技术国家级重点实验室, 北京 100190
3. 中国科学院大学电子电气与通信工程学院, 北京 100049

收稿日期:2022-02-24 出版日期:2023-01-13 发布日期:2023-02-04
通讯作者: 王宁
作者简介:王宁(1995—), 男, 硕士研究生, 主要研究方向为雷达信号处理
吕晓德(1969—), 男, 教授, 博士, 主要研究方向为多源先进雷达探测技术、阵列天线及其信号理技术、电磁散射及感知技术
李苗苗(1998—), 女, 硕士研究生, 主要研究方向为无源雷达信号处理

Gridless DOA estimation for non-redundant array at low SNR

Ning WANG¹^,²^,³^,*, Xiaode LYU¹^,², Miaomiao LI¹^,²^,³

1. Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
2. National Key Laboratory of Microwave Imaging Technology, Beijing 100190, China
3. School of Electronic, Electrical and Communication Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2022-02-24 Online:2023-01-13 Published:2023-02-04
Contact: Ning WANG

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

波达方向(direction of arrival, DOA)是阵列信号处理模型中的非线性参数, 当信噪比较低时, 其估计值会偏离真实值。为了降低无网格DOA估计方法中该问题的阈值, 介绍了一种基于无网格的基于协方差的稀疏迭代估计(sparse iterative covariance-based estimation, SPICE)方法。引入了最大似然求根多重信号分类(maximum likelihood root multiple signal classification, ML-Root-MUSIC)来计算DOA, 使用最大似然准则来选择根, 可以降低阈值并获得更好的分辨率特性。在原始无网格SPICE的优化问题中加入了负熵项, 使得无网格SPICE的均方根误差曲线更接近于Cramer-Rao下界。最后, 蒙特卡罗仿真实验验证了所提方法在低信噪比非冗余阵列情况下的优越性。

关键词: 波达方向估计, 非冗余阵列, 低信噪比, 无网格

Abstract:

Direction of arrival (DOA) is a nonlinear parameter in the array signal processing model, and its estimation deviates from the true value when the signal-to-noise ratio is low. In order to lower the threshold of this problem in gridless DOA estimation method, a method based on gridless sparse iterative covariance-based estimation (SPICE) is introduced. A maximum likelihood root multiple signal classification (ML-Root-MUSIC) is introduced to calculate DOA, which uses ML criterion to select roots and can lower the threshold and get better resolution characteristic. A negative entropy term is added to the optimization problem in the original gridless SPICE, so that the root mean square error curve of gridless SPICE is closer to Cramer-Rao lower bound in large-snapshot case. Finally, Monte Carlo simulation experiments verify that the proposed method is better than the competing methods for non-redundant arrays at low signal-to-noise ratio.

Key words: direction of arrival (DOA) estimation, non-redundant array, low signal to noise ratio (SNR), gridless

中图分类号:

TN911.72

王宁, 吕晓德, 李苗苗. 低信噪比下非冗余阵列的无网格DOA估计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(2): 352-359.

Ning WANG, Xiaode LYU, Miaomiao LI. Gridless DOA estimation for non-redundant array at low SNR[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(2): 352-359.

图/表 5

参考文献 30

1	TREES H L V . Optimum array processing: part Ⅳ of detection, estimation, and modulation theory[M]. New York: Wiley, 2002.
2	WANG Y , ZHANG Y , TIAN Z , et al. Super-resolution channel estimation for arbitrary arrays in hybrid millimeter-wave massive MIMO systems[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2019, 13 (5): 947- 960. doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2019.2937632
3	WANG M J , GAO F F , JIN S , et al. An overview of enhanced massive MIMO with array signal processing techniques[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2019, 13 (5): 886- 901. doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2019.2934931
4	STOICA P , BABU P , LI J . SPICE: a sparse covariance-based estimation method for array processing[J]. IEEE Trans.on Signal Processing, 2011, 59 (2): 629- 638. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2010.2090525
5	KAY S M . Fundamentals of statistical signal processing[M]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1993.
6	STOICA P , MOSES R L . Spectral analysis of signals[M]. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice-Hall, 2005.
7	YANG Z, LI J, STOICA P, et al. Sparse methods for direction-of-arrival estimation[M]//CHELLAPPA R, THEODORIDIS S. Academic Press Library in Signal Processing, Volume 7: Array, Radar and Communications Engineering. Oxford: Academic Press, 2018.
8	BELLONI A , CHERNOZHUKOV V , WANG L . Square-root lasso: pivotal recovery of sparse signals via conic programming[J]. Bio-metrika, 2011, 98 (4): 791- 806.
9	TAN T , ROBERTS W , LI J , et al. Sparse learning via iterative minimization with application to MIMO radar imaging[J]. IEEE Trans.on Signal Processing, 2011, 59 (3): 1088- 1101. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2010.2096218
10	JI S H , XUE Y , CARIN L . Bayesian compressive sensing[J]. IEEE Trans.on Signal Processing, 2008, 56 (6): 2346- 2356. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2007.914345
11	STOICA P , BABU P , LI J . New method of sparse parameter estimation in separable models and its use for spectral analysis of irregularly sampled data[J]. IEEE Trans.on Signal Processing, 2011, 59 (1): 35- 47. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2010.2086452
12	ZHANG Q , ABEIDA H , XUE M , et al. Fast implementation of sparse iterative covariance-based estimation for source localization[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2012, 131 (2): 1249- 1259. doi: 10.1121/1.3672656
13	STOICA P , ZACHARIAH D , LI J . Weighted SPICE: a uni-fying approach for hyperparameter-free sparse estimation[J]. Digital Signal Processing, 2014, 33, 1- 12. doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2014.06.010
14	ZHU H , LEUS G , GIANNAKIS G . Sparsity-cognizant total least-squares for perturbed compressive sampling[J]. IEEE Trans.on Signal Processing, 2011, 59 (5): 2002- 2016. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2011.2109956
15	YANG Z , XIE L H , ZHANG C S . Off-grid direction of arrival estimation using sparse Bayesian inference[J]. IEEE Trans.on Signal Processing, 2013, 61 (1): 38- 43. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2012.2222378
16	WANG Q L , ZHAO Z Q , CHEN Z , et al. Grid evolution method for DOA estimation[J]. IEEE Trans.on Signal Processing, 2018, 66 (9): 2374- 2383. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2018.2814998
17	MA Y N , CAO X B , WANG X R , et al. Multi-source off-grid DOA estimation with single snapshot using non-uniform linear arrays[J]. Signal Processing, 2021, 189, 108- 238.
18	YANG Z , XIE L H . Enhancing sparsity and resolution via reweighted atomic norm minimization[J]. IEEE Trans.on Signal Processing, 2016, 64 (4): 995- 1006. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2015.2493987
19	WAGNER M, GERSTOFT P, PARK Y. Gridless DOA estimation via alternating projections[C]//Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2019: 4215-4219.
20	MAHATA K , HYDER M M . Frequency estimation from arbitrary time samples[J]. IEEE Trans.on Signal Processing, 2016, 64 (21): 5634- 5643. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2016.2600507
21	WAGNER M , PARK Y , GERSTOFT P . Gridless DOA estimation and Root-MUSIC for non-uniform linear arrays[J]. IEEE Trans.on Signal Processing, 2021, 69, 2144- 2157. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2021.3068353
22	YANG Z , XIE L H , ZHANG C S . A discretization-free sparse and parametric approach for linear array signal processing[J]. IEEE Trans.on Signal Processing, 2014, 62 (19): 4959- 4973. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2014.2339792
23	YANG Z , XIE L H . On gridless sparse methods for line spectral estimation from complete and incomplete data[J]. IEEE Trans.on Signal Processing, 2015, 63 (12): 3139- 3153. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2015.2420541
24	CHEN T , SHI L , YU Y Z . Gridless DOA estimation with finite rate of innovation reconstruction based on symmetric Toe-plitz covariance matrix[J]. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2020, 2020 (1): 44- 59. doi: 10.1186/s13634-020-00701-7
25	ABRAMOVICH Y I , SPENCER N K , GOROKHOV A Y . Positive-definite toeplitz completion in DOA estimation for nonuniform linear antenna arrays. Ⅱ. partially augmentable arrays[J]. IEEE Trans.on Signal Processing, 1999, 47 (6): 1502- 1521. doi: 10.1109/78.765119
26	BOYD S , VANDENBERGHE L . Convex optimization[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
27	GRANT M, BOYD S. CVX: Matlab software for disciplined convex programming, Version 2.0[EB/OL]. [2022-02-24]. http://cvxr.com/cvx.
28	COVER T M , THOMAS J A . Elements of information theory[M]. Hoboken: Wiley, 2006.
29	ADALI T , SCHREIER P J , SCHARF L L . Complex-valued signal processing: the proper way to deal with impropriety[J]. IEEE Trans.on Signal Processing, 2011, 59 (11): 5101- 5125. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2011.2162954
30	ADALI T , HAYKIN S . Adaptive signal processing: next gene-ration solutions[M]. Hoboken: Wiley, 2010.

[1]	刘甲磊, 马佳智, 施龙飞. 虚拟波束四阶累积量DOA估计方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(7): 2134-2142.
[2]	曲志昱, 孙萌, 戴幻尧. 基于共形阵的角度和极化信息联合估计算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(6): 1798-1804.
[3]	韦娟, 严世安, 宁方立. 基于互质阵虚拟阵列空间平滑的相干信号DOA估计方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(4): 1069-1077.
[4]	赵忠凯, 弓浩, 张然. 基于顺序统计滤波和二元积累的辐射源信号检测方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(4): 1085-1092.
[5]	范保华, 左乐, 唐勇, 胡泽华. 基于最大期望算法的多时变信号DOA估计方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(2): 420-426.
[6]	陈涛, 史林, 申梦雨. 基于M-FIPM的无网格DOA估计算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(2): 427-433.
[7]	张俊, 张新禹, 姜卫东, 刘永祥, 黎湘. 基于广义近似消息传递的快速DOA估计方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(10): 2995-3002.
[8]	曲凌志, 杨俊安, 刘辉, 黄科举. 嵌入注意力机制的通信辐射源个体识别方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(1): 20-27.
[9]	胡毅立, 赵永波, 陈胜, 曹成虎. 基于插值拟合的抛面共形阵盲极化DOA估计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(8): 2037-2044.
[10]	张子鑫, 胡国平, 周豪, 占成宏. 基于互协方差稀疏重构的MIMO雷达低仰角估计算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(5): 1218-1223.
[11]	曹司磊, 曾维贵, 胥辉旗. 基于特征向量空间聚焦的宽带DOA估计方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(2): 294-299.
[12]	孙兵, 阮怀林, 吴晨曦, 吴世龙, 钟华. 幅度相位误差条件下的互质阵列DOA估计方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(12): 3488-3494.
[13]	张盛魁, 姚志成, 何岷, 范志良, 杨剑. 基于时频方差聚类的FH信号参数盲估计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(8): 1662-1667.
[14]	李晓强, 陈建峰, 谭伟杰, 温洋, 张蓉蓉. 基于协方差矩阵重构的单基地MIMO阵列无网格DOA估计方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(5): 969-977.
[15]	袁莉芬, 宁暑光, 何怡刚, 吕密, 路健. 基于高阶累积量特征学习的调制识别方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(9): 2122-2131.

低信噪比下非冗余阵列的无网格DOA估计

Gridless DOA estimation for non-redundant array at low SNR

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价